The Platonic Hipparchus on Profit and Value

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13410%2F25%3A43899546" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13410/25:43899546 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.petiteplaisance.it/libri/491-550/523/sin523.html" target="_blank" >https://www.petiteplaisance.it/libri/491-550/523/sin523.html</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Platonic Hipparchus on Profit and Value

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The dialogue Hipparchus (I do not deal with the question of its authorship) is a lively and rich dialogue. Its most striking feature is its presentation of the Platonic evaluative reductionism, very similar to the versions known from Plato&apos;s Lysis and Charmides: for the purpose of practical evaluation, it is best to restrict oneself to the one-dimensional scale between good and bad (or useful and harmful). I discuss the position of this proposal in the history of ethics and philosophy of action, and I show why all the passages where Plato or his followers use this principle the results are so implausible and unsatisfactory. It is because Plato does not introduce any criterion that would help one to determine a position of an action in question on that scale.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Platonic Hipparchus on Profit and Value

Popis výsledku anglicky

The dialogue Hipparchus (I do not deal with the question of its authorship) is a lively and rich dialogue. Its most striking feature is its presentation of the Platonic evaluative reductionism, very similar to the versions known from Plato&apos;s Lysis and Charmides: for the purpose of practical evaluation, it is best to restrict oneself to the one-dimensional scale between good and bad (or useful and harmful). I discuss the position of this proposal in the history of ethics and philosophy of action, and I show why all the passages where Plato or his followers use this principle the results are so implausible and unsatisfactory. It is because Plato does not introduce any criterion that would help one to determine a position of an action in question on that scale.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Oikos Nomos: Politics and Economics in Ancient Thought

ISBN

978-88-7588-391-1

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

85-98

Počet stran knihy

244

Název nakladatele

petite plaisance

Místo vydání

Pistoia

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—