The Analysis of Accuracy of Machined Surfaces and Surfaces Roughness after 3axis and 5axis Milling

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13420%2F18%3A43894350" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13420/18:43894350 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/61989100:27230/18:10240538

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://arl.ujep.cz/arl-ujep/cs/csg/?repo=ujeprepo&key=81054013527" target="_blank" >https://arl.ujep.cz/arl-ujep/cs/csg/?repo=ujeprepo&key=81054013527</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21062/ujep/217.2018/a/1213-2489/mt/18/6/1015" target="_blank" >10.21062/ujep/217.2018/a/1213-2489/mt/18/6/1015</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Analysis of Accuracy of Machined Surfaces and Surfaces Roughness after 3axis and 5axis Milling

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article concentrates on the assessment of a 3D shape of parts of components. The 3D shape is divided into three distinctive shapes: a spherical canopy, a pyramid, and a concave transition between these shapes. Create these shape surfaces, various strategies of 3axis and 5axis milling are used. These strategies are described and then compared on a model in CAM MasterCAM software. The surface of the component is further measured with a roughness measuring device. The accuracy of the surface of the component is measured using a 3D measurement centre and then compared between surfaces with a different machining strategy. The last criterion for comparing machining strategies is to compare machining surfaces with a drawn tool over a pushed tool. Lastly, the best machining strategy is selected for the most suited surface of the component.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Analysis of Accuracy of Machined Surfaces and Surfaces Roughness after 3axis and 5axis Milling

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article concentrates on the assessment of a 3D shape of parts of components. The 3D shape is divided into three distinctive shapes: a spherical canopy, a pyramid, and a concave transition between these shapes. Create these shape surfaces, various strategies of 3axis and 5axis milling are used. These strategies are described and then compared on a model in CAM MasterCAM software. The surface of the component is further measured with a roughness measuring device. The accuracy of the surface of the component is measured using a 3D measurement centre and then compared between surfaces with a different machining strategy. The last criterion for comparing machining strategies is to compare machining surfaces with a drawn tool over a pushed tool. Lastly, the best machining strategy is selected for the most suited surface of the component.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20301 - Mechanical engineering

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Manufacturing Technology

ISSN

1213-2489

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

18

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

1015-1022

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85059305046