The analysis of accuracy of machined surfaces and surfaces roughness after 3axis and 5axis milling
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27230%2F18%3A10240538" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27230/18:10240538 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/44555601:13420/18:43894350
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://profily.vsb.cz/sad76" target="_blank" >http://profily.vsb.cz/sad76</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21062/ujep/217.2018/a/1213-2489/mt/18/6/1015" target="_blank" >10.21062/ujep/217.2018/a/1213-2489/mt/18/6/1015</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The analysis of accuracy of machined surfaces and surfaces roughness after 3axis and 5axis milling
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This article concentrates on the assessment of a 3D shape of parts of components. The 3D shape is divided into three distinctive shapes: a spherical canopy, a pyramid, and a concave transition between these shapes. Create these shape surfaces, various strategies of 3axis and 5axis milling are used. These strategies are described and then compared on a model in CAM MasterCAM software. The surface of the component is further measured with a roughness measuring device. The accuracy of the surface of the component is measured using a 3D measurement centre and then compared between surfaces with a different machining strategy. The last criterion for comparing machining strategies is to compare machining surfaces with a drawn tool over a pushed tool. Lastly, the best machining strategy is selected for the most suited surface of the component. (C) 2018. Published by Manufacturing Technology.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The analysis of accuracy of machined surfaces and surfaces roughness after 3axis and 5axis milling
Popis výsledku anglicky
This article concentrates on the assessment of a 3D shape of parts of components. The 3D shape is divided into three distinctive shapes: a spherical canopy, a pyramid, and a concave transition between these shapes. Create these shape surfaces, various strategies of 3axis and 5axis milling are used. These strategies are described and then compared on a model in CAM MasterCAM software. The surface of the component is further measured with a roughness measuring device. The accuracy of the surface of the component is measured using a 3D measurement centre and then compared between surfaces with a different machining strategy. The last criterion for comparing machining strategies is to compare machining surfaces with a drawn tool over a pushed tool. Lastly, the best machining strategy is selected for the most suited surface of the component. (C) 2018. Published by Manufacturing Technology.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20301 - Mechanical engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Manufacturing Technology
ISSN
1213-2489
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
18
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
1015-1022
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85059305046