How Central Europe is Perceived and Delimited
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13440%2F16%3A43887775" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13440/16:43887775 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/60076658:12410/16:43891394
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
How Central Europe is Perceived and Delimited
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The paper deals with the issue of perception and delimitation of Central Europe (CE). The first part introduces and discusses basic concepts and conceptions of CE which might be found in the selected parts and might be considered crucial in this respect. Attention is then focused on the possible differences in the perception of CE from the perspective of individual nations and to interpret what might cause these differences. The following empiric part of the study compares previous theoretical knowledge and assumptions that can be made from the results of the research. The research was carried out through a questionnaire survey to collect the mental maps of selected individuals. The respondents of the research were senior high school students and first year university students from eight CE countries. Their task was to mark the borders of CE based on their subjective perception onto a map of Europe. A total of 490 mental maps were taken, analysed, and aggregated into the GIS map outputs. The final part compares and interprets the results, i.e. map output which was obtained through the data from individual countries. The authors reflect on the questions of how and why the results differ in individual states and to what extent they match hypothetical assumptions of the "national" perception of CE space.
Název v anglickém jazyce
How Central Europe is Perceived and Delimited
Popis výsledku anglicky
The paper deals with the issue of perception and delimitation of Central Europe (CE). The first part introduces and discusses basic concepts and conceptions of CE which might be found in the selected parts and might be considered crucial in this respect. Attention is then focused on the possible differences in the perception of CE from the perspective of individual nations and to interpret what might cause these differences. The following empiric part of the study compares previous theoretical knowledge and assumptions that can be made from the results of the research. The research was carried out through a questionnaire survey to collect the mental maps of selected individuals. The respondents of the research were senior high school students and first year university students from eight CE countries. Their task was to mark the borders of CE based on their subjective perception onto a map of Europe. A total of 490 mental maps were taken, analysed, and aggregated into the GIS map outputs. The final part compares and interprets the results, i.e. map output which was obtained through the data from individual countries. The authors reflect on the questions of how and why the results differ in individual states and to what extent they match hypothetical assumptions of the "national" perception of CE space.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
DE - Zemský magnetismus, geodesie, geografie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA16-01003S" target="_blank" >GA16-01003S: Vizuální geografická informace a její role v geografickém vzdělávání</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft
ISSN
0029-9138
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
158
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
AT - Rakouská republika
Počet stran výsledku
22
Strana od-do
193-214
Kód UT WoS článku
000393632200011
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—