Approaches to state flood recovery funding in Visegrad Group Countries

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13440%2F20%3A43894744" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13440/20:43894744 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/44555601:13510/20:43894744

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17477891.2019.1667749" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17477891.2019.1667749</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2019.1667749" target="_blank" >10.1080/17477891.2019.1667749</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Approaches to state flood recovery funding in Visegrad Group Countries

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Flood recovery is an important period in the flood risk management cycle. Recently, flood recovery has become viewed as an opportunity for future flood damage mitigation. Financial flows to cover flood damages and rules regarding their allocation are crucial for supporting or undermining mitigation efforts. In this paper, we map and compare state flood recovery funding in the so-called Visegrad Group Countries (V4), i.e. Czechia, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, over the past 30 years of their democratic history. We apply a qualitative comparative approach to identify differences and similarities in risk sharing and state flood recovery funding approaches among these countries. Additionally, we reveal how risk sharing is addressed by existing flood recovery funding schemes. The results indicate that national governments have a low willingness to institutionalise ex-ante compensation schemes. Ad hoc instruments initiated shortly after disastrous flooding usually do not provide incentives to reduce future flood damages.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Approaches to state flood recovery funding in Visegrad Group Countries

Popis výsledku anglicky

Flood recovery is an important period in the flood risk management cycle. Recently, flood recovery has become viewed as an opportunity for future flood damage mitigation. Financial flows to cover flood damages and rules regarding their allocation are crucial for supporting or undermining mitigation efforts. In this paper, we map and compare state flood recovery funding in the so-called Visegrad Group Countries (V4), i.e. Czechia, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, over the past 30 years of their democratic history. We apply a qualitative comparative approach to identify differences and similarities in risk sharing and state flood recovery funding approaches among these countries. Additionally, we reveal how risk sharing is addressed by existing flood recovery funding schemes. The results indicate that national governments have a low willingness to institutionalise ex-ante compensation schemes. Ad hoc instruments initiated shortly after disastrous flooding usually do not provide incentives to reduce future flood damages.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/LTC18025" target="_blank" >LTC18025: LAND4FLOOD: Realizace přírodě blízkých retenčních opatření na soukromé půdě</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Environmental hazards - human and policy dimensions

ISSN

1747-7891

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

19

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

251-267

Kód UT WoS článku

000489545300001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85074355119