Paradoxes of financial schemes for resilient flood recovery of households

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13510%2F21%3A43896101" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13510/21:43896101 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/wat2.1497" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/wat2.1497</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1497" target="_blank" >10.1002/wat2.1497</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Paradoxes of financial schemes for resilient flood recovery of households

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Flood resilience (resilient flood risk management), which has been repeatedly demanded, can be achieved through the phases of the risk management cycle. There is a vast body of literature on adaptation, disaster risk reduction measures, and effectiveness of prevention, seen through the lens of postdisaster recovery, but oftentimes the existing literature seems to underestimate the impact of financial flood recovery schemes on resilient recovery of individual households in particular. This contribution focuses on how financial schemes for flood damage compensations-their sources, design, and timing-shape the resilience of recovery of individual households. It discusses the dilemma of recovery of whether recovery schemes should be used strategically to increase resilience, or rather serve early restoration needs, equality access issues, and so on. This contribution seeks to unify the current fragmented academic debate on household resilient recovery by focusing on the ambiguous role of financial recovery schemes.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Paradoxes of financial schemes for resilient flood recovery of households

Popis výsledku anglicky

Flood resilience (resilient flood risk management), which has been repeatedly demanded, can be achieved through the phases of the risk management cycle. There is a vast body of literature on adaptation, disaster risk reduction measures, and effectiveness of prevention, seen through the lens of postdisaster recovery, but oftentimes the existing literature seems to underestimate the impact of financial flood recovery schemes on resilient recovery of individual households in particular. This contribution focuses on how financial schemes for flood damage compensations-their sources, design, and timing-shape the resilience of recovery of individual households. It discusses the dilemma of recovery of whether recovery schemes should be used strategically to increase resilience, or rather serve early restoration needs, equality access issues, and so on. This contribution seeks to unify the current fragmented academic debate on household resilient recovery by focusing on the ambiguous role of financial recovery schemes.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10503 - Water resources

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/LTC18025" target="_blank" >LTC18025: LAND4FLOOD: Realizace přírodě blízkých retenčních opatření na soukromé půdě</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews WIREs. Water

ISSN

2049-1948

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

8

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

1-9

Kód UT WoS článku

000595547000001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—