Compensatory approaches and engagement techniques to gain flood storage in England and Wales

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13510%2F18%3A43895520" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13510/18:43895520 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jfr3.12336" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jfr3.12336</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12336" target="_blank" >10.1111/jfr3.12336</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Compensatory approaches and engagement techniques to gain flood storage in England and Wales

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Flood storage involves creating sacrificial land for water to purposefully inundate to protect land downstream. Obtaining the right or co-operation to flood on private property remains a challenge. This paper is based on empirical qualitative research with 14 key stakeholders involved in the practice of gaining land to flood in England and Wales and the different forms of financial and economic approaches that might be used to facilitate this right. Expropriation of land, one off-payment, annual single payment, and flood event losses compensation were explored. Availability of funding as compensation is the main driver for landowner adoption of flood storage schemes. Three funding approaches were revealed; flowage easement, full land purchase, and agricultural schemes funding diffuse storage. Rather than attempting to gain partnerships between spatially dislocated stakeholders in upper storage and lower impacted catchments success resides on the storage land and persuading landowner co-operation. A clear enforced legal framework of ownership of land and funding mechanisms is also viewed as essential.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Compensatory approaches and engagement techniques to gain flood storage in England and Wales

Popis výsledku anglicky

Flood storage involves creating sacrificial land for water to purposefully inundate to protect land downstream. Obtaining the right or co-operation to flood on private property remains a challenge. This paper is based on empirical qualitative research with 14 key stakeholders involved in the practice of gaining land to flood in England and Wales and the different forms of financial and economic approaches that might be used to facilitate this right. Expropriation of land, one off-payment, annual single payment, and flood event losses compensation were explored. Availability of funding as compensation is the main driver for landowner adoption of flood storage schemes. Three funding approaches were revealed; flowage easement, full land purchase, and agricultural schemes funding diffuse storage. Rather than attempting to gain partnerships between spatially dislocated stakeholders in upper storage and lower impacted catchments success resides on the storage land and persuading landowner co-operation. A clear enforced legal framework of ownership of land and funding mechanisms is also viewed as essential.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10503 - Water resources

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Flood Risk Management

ISSN

1753-318X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

85-94

Kód UT WoS článku

000428435400010

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85042183221