Revisiting geochemical methods of distinguishing natural concentrations and pollution by risk elements in fluvial sediments
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13520%2F16%3A43887721" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13520/16:43887721 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/61388980:_____/16:00463509
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.08.003" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.08.003</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.08.003" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.08.003</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Revisiting geochemical methods of distinguishing natural concentrations and pollution by risk elements in fluvial sediments
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper provides an overview of the natural variability of the element composition of fluvial sediments, paying particular attention to As, Al, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Ti, and Zn. The primary factors controlling the sediment composition are source rocks in the river catchment, the extent of their weathering, the sorting of so-formed solids during transport through the catchment, and their chemical transformations, in particular reductive/oxidative-driven processes, particularly affecting the finest particles in the fluvial systems. Those factors result in grain-size control as the major source of variation of the sediment's chemical composition; they also change element patterns (ratios, associations) in the finest sediment components compared to Earth's upper crust. Grain-size control of element composition (the grain-size effect) is suppressed by geochemical normalization and is best treated through geochemical background functions applied to analyses of bulk samples. Robust regression should be preferred for inter-element relationships in fluvial sediments. Conversely, the evaluation of element concentrations in sediments neglecting grain size or using particle-size separation (e.g., sieving to submillimetre size fractions) to separate only a minor weight fraction of the sediment should be avoided in research. Improper data processing and a lack of respect for natural variability may prevent the recognition of anthropogenic pollution. The use of inappropriate statistic tools in this task, such as the mean +- 2?,boxplots, and ordinary least-squares' regression, is primarily hindered by the lack of a Gaussian distribution of element concentrations in real collections of fluvial sediments and neglect of a suite of natural factors inherent to fluvial sediments.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Revisiting geochemical methods of distinguishing natural concentrations and pollution by risk elements in fluvial sediments
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper provides an overview of the natural variability of the element composition of fluvial sediments, paying particular attention to As, Al, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Ti, and Zn. The primary factors controlling the sediment composition are source rocks in the river catchment, the extent of their weathering, the sorting of so-formed solids during transport through the catchment, and their chemical transformations, in particular reductive/oxidative-driven processes, particularly affecting the finest particles in the fluvial systems. Those factors result in grain-size control as the major source of variation of the sediment's chemical composition; they also change element patterns (ratios, associations) in the finest sediment components compared to Earth's upper crust. Grain-size control of element composition (the grain-size effect) is suppressed by geochemical normalization and is best treated through geochemical background functions applied to analyses of bulk samples. Robust regression should be preferred for inter-element relationships in fluvial sediments. Conversely, the evaluation of element concentrations in sediments neglecting grain size or using particle-size separation (e.g., sieving to submillimetre size fractions) to separate only a minor weight fraction of the sediment should be avoided in research. Improper data processing and a lack of respect for natural variability may prevent the recognition of anthropogenic pollution. The use of inappropriate statistic tools in this task, such as the mean +- 2?,boxplots, and ordinary least-squares' regression, is primarily hindered by the lack of a Gaussian distribution of element concentrations in real collections of fluvial sediments and neglect of a suite of natural factors inherent to fluvial sediments.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
DD - Geochemie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA15-00340S" target="_blank" >GA15-00340S: Antropogenní znečištění a stavba říčních niv: dva fenomény a jediný příběh</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Geochemical Exploration
ISSN
0375-6742
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
2016
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
170
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
19
Strana od-do
39-57
Kód UT WoS článku
000386405300005
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—