Comparing innovative ‘chosen training’ with ‘standard training’ in Czechia: How did the new program help?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F45773009%3A_____%2F23%3AN0000021" target="_blank" >RIV/45773009:_____/23:N0000021 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216224:14230/23:00132424

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.rsp.hr/ojs2/index.php/rsp/article/viewFile/1941/1590" target="_blank" >http://www.rsp.hr/ojs2/index.php/rsp/article/viewFile/1941/1590</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v30i2.1941" target="_blank" >10.3935/rsp.v30i2.1941</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparing innovative ‘chosen training’ with ‘standard training’ in Czechia: How did the new program help?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper evaluates the active labour market policy instrument called ‘chosen training’ (in Czech zvolené rekvalifikace), introduced to the Czech labour market policy in 2012. This new instrument allows the registered unemployed much more freedom to choose their supposed future career path by selecting the preferred profession for training and preferred training provider than traditional standard training programs. The added value of this paper is in the intentional linking of the provision of new measures with the assessment of impacts. The methodology of this text is based on quantitative program assessment. We used PES administrative data OK Práce for programmes implemented in 2016 and tracked the outcomes for 2016-2020. We compare a new instrument with more traditional training programs that continue to be provided alongside the new tool. We concluded that chosen training provided better results than standard training, and we addressed some of the reasons behind the perceived difference.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparing innovative ‘chosen training’ with ‘standard training’ in Czechia: How did the new program help?

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper evaluates the active labour market policy instrument called ‘chosen training’ (in Czech zvolené rekvalifikace), introduced to the Czech labour market policy in 2012. This new instrument allows the registered unemployed much more freedom to choose their supposed future career path by selecting the preferred profession for training and preferred training provider than traditional standard training programs. The added value of this paper is in the intentional linking of the provision of new measures with the assessment of impacts. The methodology of this text is based on quantitative program assessment. We used PES administrative data OK Práce for programmes implemented in 2016 and tracked the outcomes for 2016-2020. We compare a new instrument with more traditional training programs that continue to be provided alongside the new tool. We concluded that chosen training provided better results than standard training, and we addressed some of the reasons behind the perceived difference.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50401 - Sociology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Revija za socijalnu politiku

ISSN

1330-2965

e-ISSN

1845-6014

Svazek periodika

30

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

HR - Chorvatská republika

Počet stran výsledku

21

Strana od-do

119–139

Kód UT WoS článku

001144763000010

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85182473909