Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Transparent Lobbying - the Costs Connected with It

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46747885%3A24310%2F17%3A00004557" target="_blank" >RIV/46747885:24310/17:00004557 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://www.lef-tul.cz/sekce/LEF_2017.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.lef-tul.cz/sekce/LEF_2017.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Transparent Lobbying - the Costs Connected with It

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Lobbying transparency increase can be considered a specific public project, i.e. a systemic proposal of public funds allocation. The aim of the article is to identify the costs associated with transparent lobbing. Modern dynamic indicators which analyse costs (input) of a project and are related to its utilities (output) are reflected from the viewpoint of public project evaluation. The used CBA (Cost Benefit Analysis) method was specified on the basis of the delimitation of characteristics and attributes of transparent lobbying. The evaluation of the project is performed on the basis of the creation of a specific model of a social-economic analysis in a non-reduced form. The model works with the delimitation of quantifiable and non-quantifiable costs and benefits of the project. The basic variants of the final states were determined, namely: 1) the existence of the current legislation and 2) the project variant of lobbying transparency increase, which was further divided into 2.1) a project variant of lobbying transparency increase by means of legislation changes and 2.2) a project variant of lobbying transparency increase on the basis of self-regulation principles. From the viewpoint of costs, the second option is financially more demanding and mainly the option of implemented legislation changes. The variant by means of self-regulation can, but does not have to, be accompanied by additional costs. The first variant is not connected with any immediate financial costs. The selection of the most suitable variant will be done in relation with the presupposed acquired quantifiable and non-quantifiable benefits.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Transparent Lobbying - the Costs Connected with It

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Lobbying transparency increase can be considered a specific public project, i.e. a systemic proposal of public funds allocation. The aim of the article is to identify the costs associated with transparent lobbing. Modern dynamic indicators which analyse costs (input) of a project and are related to its utilities (output) are reflected from the viewpoint of public project evaluation. The used CBA (Cost Benefit Analysis) method was specified on the basis of the delimitation of characteristics and attributes of transparent lobbying. The evaluation of the project is performed on the basis of the creation of a specific model of a social-economic analysis in a non-reduced form. The model works with the delimitation of quantifiable and non-quantifiable costs and benefits of the project. The basic variants of the final states were determined, namely: 1) the existence of the current legislation and 2) the project variant of lobbying transparency increase, which was further divided into 2.1) a project variant of lobbying transparency increase by means of legislation changes and 2.2) a project variant of lobbying transparency increase on the basis of self-regulation principles. From the viewpoint of costs, the second option is financially more demanding and mainly the option of implemented legislation changes. The variant by means of self-regulation can, but does not have to, be accompanied by additional costs. The first variant is not connected with any immediate financial costs. The selection of the most suitable variant will be done in relation with the presupposed acquired quantifiable and non-quantifiable benefits.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GA16-08786S" target="_blank" >GA16-08786S: Dopad transparentnosti lobbingu na demokratizaci a její důsledky</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2017

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    Liberec Economic Forum 2017

  • ISBN

    978-80-7494-349-2

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Počet stran výsledku

    9

  • Strana od-do

    411-419

  • Název nakladatele

    Technical University of Liberec

  • Místo vydání

    Liberec

  • Místo konání akce

    Liberec

  • Datum konání akce

    1. 1. 2017

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    EUR - Evropská akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000426486500046