Measurement of Thermal Resistance on Thermal Foot Model Compared to Alambeta

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46747885%3A24410%2F18%3A00006111" target="_blank" >RIV/46747885:24410/18:00006111 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://strutex.ft.tul.cz/2018/Phd/BookOfExtendedAbstracts_STRUTEX_2018_International_PhD_student_day.pdf" target="_blank" >http://strutex.ft.tul.cz/2018/Phd/BookOfExtendedAbstracts_STRUTEX_2018_International_PhD_student_day.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Measurement of Thermal Resistance on Thermal Foot Model Compared to Alambeta

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Thermal Manikins are designed to simulate the human body’s heat exchange and its interaction with the surrounding environment. There are two types of testing on Thermal Manikin (i.e. nude and clothed manikin). Initial thermal resistance (Rct0) is measured on both nude and clothed Thermal Foot Model (TFM). Clothed TFM by using four types of woven compression bandages (WCBs). Thermal resistance (Rct) is evaluated for the same types of WCBs. All bandage types were applied at extension ranges 10 to 80%, using both two and three layers bandaging. Obtained results of thermal resistance confirmed that clothed TFM is more accurate for measuring Rct0 due to more stabilization and less effect of air convection. Measured Rct values were compared to the Alambeta instrument results. There is little deviation between Rct values on TFM and Alambeta. Results by Alambeta are higher for all types of WCBs in both two and three layers techniques, this may be due to the variation of the testing methods and principles.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Measurement of Thermal Resistance on Thermal Foot Model Compared to Alambeta

Popis výsledku anglicky

Thermal Manikins are designed to simulate the human body’s heat exchange and its interaction with the surrounding environment. There are two types of testing on Thermal Manikin (i.e. nude and clothed manikin). Initial thermal resistance (Rct0) is measured on both nude and clothed Thermal Foot Model (TFM). Clothed TFM by using four types of woven compression bandages (WCBs). Thermal resistance (Rct) is evaluated for the same types of WCBs. All bandage types were applied at extension ranges 10 to 80%, using both two and three layers bandaging. Obtained results of thermal resistance confirmed that clothed TFM is more accurate for measuring Rct0 due to more stabilization and less effect of air convection. Measured Rct values were compared to the Alambeta instrument results. There is little deviation between Rct values on TFM and Alambeta. Results by Alambeta are higher for all types of WCBs in both two and three layers techniques, this may be due to the variation of the testing methods and principles.

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20503 - Textiles; including synthetic dyes, colours, fibres (nanoscale materials to be 2.10; biomaterials to be 2.9)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů