Interruption as a reflection of speaker’s identity in the 2020 US presidential debates
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46747885%3A24510%2F21%3A00009496" target="_blank" >RIV/46747885:24510/21:00009496 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.22210/suvlin.2021.092.08" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.22210/suvlin.2021.092.08</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.22210/suvlin.2021.092.08" target="_blank" >10.22210/suvlin.2021.092.08</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Interruption as a reflection of speaker’s identity in the 2020 US presidential debates
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The article establishes the role of interruption as a key communicative strategy which defined the character of the 2020 US presidential debates. It is posited that the participants of the debates, namely Donald Trump and Joseph Biden, realized how effective certain types of linguistic behavior could be and deliberately used specific communicative tactics to achieve better results and win the voters’ support. Some of the strategies that the participants resorted to were merely situational; however, most of the strategies identified in the research had a recurrent nature representing the debating styles of the politicians. It is also assumed in the study that repeated breaches of a normal turn–taking process such as systemic interruptions have the potential to modify the public perception of the politician’s communicative styles, which are seen in the paper as inherent components of the politicians’ identities.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Interruption as a reflection of speaker’s identity in the 2020 US presidential debates
Popis výsledku anglicky
The article establishes the role of interruption as a key communicative strategy which defined the character of the 2020 US presidential debates. It is posited that the participants of the debates, namely Donald Trump and Joseph Biden, realized how effective certain types of linguistic behavior could be and deliberately used specific communicative tactics to achieve better results and win the voters’ support. Some of the strategies that the participants resorted to were merely situational; however, most of the strategies identified in the research had a recurrent nature representing the debating styles of the politicians. It is also assumed in the study that repeated breaches of a normal turn–taking process such as systemic interruptions have the potential to modify the public perception of the politician’s communicative styles, which are seen in the paper as inherent components of the politicians’ identities.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60203 - Linguistics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Suvremena
ISSN
0586-0296
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
47
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
92
Stát vydavatele periodika
HR - Chorvatská republika
Počet stran výsledku
24
Strana od-do
283-306
Kód UT WoS článku
000744129000008
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85122157697