Effectiveness of Interruption as a Communicative Strategy in the 2020 Presidential Debates in the USA

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46747885%3A24510%2F22%3A00011380" target="_blank" >RIV/46747885:24510/22:00011380 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/_flysystem/fedora/pdf/BSE_48_2022_2_07.pdf" target="_blank" >https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/_flysystem/fedora/pdf/BSE_48_2022_2_07.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/BSE2022-2-5" target="_blank" >10.5817/BSE2022-2-5</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Effectiveness of Interruption as a Communicative Strategy in the 2020 Presidential Debates in the USA

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The research hypothesizes that the American 2020 Presidential debate participants used recurrent interruptions as a communicative strategy to gain more power on the debate floor and win the voters’ support. The form of political interaction (televised debates) also affected the candidates’ speech behavior in a way that it added another participant (the general public) to the discussion; as a result, an institutionally controlled form of political discourse was subjected to a medial turn. This kind of media influence contributed to the speakers’ choice of specific interruption types during the debates. The research analyses the turn-taking strategies of D. Trump and J. Biden employed in the First and Second (and Final) Debates and matches them with the pre- and post-debate poll results. The article concludes that although having a certain impact on the perception of the politicians’ personalities, the effect of interruptions as a debate strategy on the voters’ final choices was marginal.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Effectiveness of Interruption as a Communicative Strategy in the 2020 Presidential Debates in the USA

Popis výsledku anglicky

The research hypothesizes that the American 2020 Presidential debate participants used recurrent interruptions as a communicative strategy to gain more power on the debate floor and win the voters’ support. The form of political interaction (televised debates) also affected the candidates’ speech behavior in a way that it added another participant (the general public) to the discussion; as a result, an institutionally controlled form of political discourse was subjected to a medial turn. This kind of media influence contributed to the speakers’ choice of specific interruption types during the debates. The research analyses the turn-taking strategies of D. Trump and J. Biden employed in the First and Second (and Final) Debates and matches them with the pre- and post-debate poll results. The article concludes that although having a certain impact on the perception of the politicians’ personalities, the effect of interruptions as a debate strategy on the voters’ final choices was marginal.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60203 - Linguistics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Brno Studies in English

ISSN

0524-6881

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

48

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

210

Strana od-do

101-118

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85163560336