Is the Secularization Thesis a Helpful Tool for Understanding the Modern Religious History of CEE? A Case of the Czech Republic
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46747885%3A24510%2F24%3A00012866" target="_blank" >RIV/46747885:24510/24:00012866 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://brill.com/display/book/9789004713802/BP000007.xml" target="_blank" >https://brill.com/display/book/9789004713802/BP000007.xml</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004713802_006" target="_blank" >10.1163/9789004713802_006</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Is the Secularization Thesis a Helpful Tool for Understanding the Modern Religious History of CEE? A Case of the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Despite its popularity, the secularization thesis has become a target of much criticism in the past twenty years. There is no doubt that contemporary Euro-American society is based on the reasonable separation of Church and state, due to which people live relatively separated from the direct “interference” on the part of religion and can choose from an extensive range of religions without being limited or prosecuted. There were four most frequent objections. The first is that the secularization theory is internally weak in its logical structure. The second reprimand is supported by data obtained from surveys carried out in recent times, which challenge the secularization theory on the gradual extinction of religions. The third reason for dismissing the secularization thesis is an empirically provable statement maintaining that contemporary society is stricken with a wave of alternative religiosity related to the phenomenon of the so-called new religious movements and, more so, to new forms of established churches. And finally, the fourth reason to rebuke is that religion remains an influential political and economic power worldwide. This last objection to the secularization theory is the most fundamental and productive. The chapter is focused on analysing the application of the so-called secularization thesis for Central and Eastern European countries, and it tries to show that this part of Europe underwent various types or forms of secularization.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Is the Secularization Thesis a Helpful Tool for Understanding the Modern Religious History of CEE? A Case of the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku anglicky
Despite its popularity, the secularization thesis has become a target of much criticism in the past twenty years. There is no doubt that contemporary Euro-American society is based on the reasonable separation of Church and state, due to which people live relatively separated from the direct “interference” on the part of religion and can choose from an extensive range of religions without being limited or prosecuted. There were four most frequent objections. The first is that the secularization theory is internally weak in its logical structure. The second reprimand is supported by data obtained from surveys carried out in recent times, which challenge the secularization theory on the gradual extinction of religions. The third reason for dismissing the secularization thesis is an empirically provable statement maintaining that contemporary society is stricken with a wave of alternative religiosity related to the phenomenon of the so-called new religious movements and, more so, to new forms of established churches. And finally, the fourth reason to rebuke is that religion remains an influential political and economic power worldwide. This last objection to the secularization theory is the most fundamental and productive. The chapter is focused on analysing the application of the so-called secularization thesis for Central and Eastern European countries, and it tries to show that this part of Europe underwent various types or forms of secularization.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60304 - Religious studies
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
Annual Review of the Sociology of Religion
ISBN
978-90-04-71379-6
Počet stran výsledku
25
Strana od-do
103-127
Počet stran knihy
328
Název nakladatele
Brill
Místo vydání
Leiden
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—