Evaluation of ranking similarity in ordinal ranking problems
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F47813059%3A19520%2F11%3A%230001446" target="_blank" >RIV/47813059:19520/11:#0001446 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Evaluation of ranking similarity in ordinal ranking problems
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In ordinal ranking problems objects, alternatives, products, services, etc. are ranked by several experts and the goal is to convert a set of (generally different) rankings into the final group consensus ranking. However, this goal depends on a degree ofagreement among rankings. With random rankings one cannot expect to get meaningful consensus, but if rankings are "close" and represent agreement between experts, then the final group consensus has much more sense. The aim of this article is to presentthe evaluation of similarity among rankings, which is based on Kendall's ? and W, Spearman's ?, Pearson's r and dot product of vectors. Cases without and with ties are discussed as well as a problem of similarity between incomplete rankings (top k lists). Explanations are based on examples.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Evaluation of ranking similarity in ordinal ranking problems
Popis výsledku anglicky
In ordinal ranking problems objects, alternatives, products, services, etc. are ranked by several experts and the goal is to convert a set of (generally different) rankings into the final group consensus ranking. However, this goal depends on a degree ofagreement among rankings. With random rankings one cannot expect to get meaningful consensus, but if rankings are "close" and represent agreement between experts, then the final group consensus has much more sense. The aim of this article is to presentthe evaluation of similarity among rankings, which is based on Kendall's ? and W, Spearman's ?, Pearson's r and dot product of vectors. Cases without and with ties are discussed as well as a problem of similarity between incomplete rankings (top k lists). Explanations are based on examples.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AH - Ekonomie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2011
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Acta academica karviniensia
ISSN
1212-415X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
—
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
119-128
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—