The Threats of Russian Influence and Terrorism within National Security Strategies of the Visegrad Four

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48135445%3A_____%2F20%3AN0000025" target="_blank" >RIV/48135445:_____/20:N0000025 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/48135445:_____/20:N0000099

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13518046.2020.1763129" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13518046.2020.1763129</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2020.1763129" target="_blank" >10.1080/13518046.2020.1763129</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Threats of Russian Influence and Terrorism within National Security Strategies of the Visegrad Four

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper explores the differences in risk assessment of the V4 states of two politically differently sensitive security threats (Russian influence and terrorism). The comparison was performed using two latest versions of national security strategies. Using discourse analysis and placing each national approach into the context of both national and international politics, it finds that significant differences exist in the understanding of security risks, even despite the same geopolitical localization and comparable situation of the individual V4 states. Regarding the threat of restoring Russian influence in the region, but also in the matter of fight with terrorism, each country accentuates different conclusions. An appeal to coordinate risk assessment would be appropriate not only on the government, but also on the expert and academic levels.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Threats of Russian Influence and Terrorism within National Security Strategies of the Visegrad Four

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper explores the differences in risk assessment of the V4 states of two politically differently sensitive security threats (Russian influence and terrorism). The comparison was performed using two latest versions of national security strategies. Using discourse analysis and placing each national approach into the context of both national and international politics, it finds that significant differences exist in the understanding of security risks, even despite the same geopolitical localization and comparable situation of the individual V4 states. Regarding the threat of restoring Russian influence in the region, but also in the matter of fight with terrorism, each country accentuates different conclusions. An appeal to coordinate risk assessment would be appropriate not only on the government, but also on the expert and academic levels.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

The Journal of Slavic Military Studies London

ISSN

1351-8046

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

33

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2/2020

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

25

Strana od-do

173-197

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85087645473