The Threats of Russian Influence and Terrorism within National Security Strategies of the Visegrad Four
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48135445%3A_____%2F20%3AN0000099" target="_blank" >RIV/48135445:_____/20:N0000099 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/48135445:_____/20:N0000025
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13518046.2020.1763129" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13518046.2020.1763129</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2020.1763129" target="_blank" >10.1080/13518046.2020.1763129</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The Threats of Russian Influence and Terrorism within National Security Strategies of the Visegrad Four
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This article explores the differences in risk assessment of the V4 states of two politically differently sensitive security threats (Russian influence and terrorism). The comparison was performed using two latest versions of national security strategies. Using discourse analysis and placing each national approach into the context of both national and international politics, it finds that significant differences exist in the understanding of security risks, even despite the same geopolitical localization and comparable situation of the individual V4 states. Regarding the threat of restoring Russian influence in the region, but also in the matter of fight with terrorism, each country accentuates different conclusions. An appeal to coordinate risk assessment would be appropriate not only on the government, but also on the expert and academic levels.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The Threats of Russian Influence and Terrorism within National Security Strategies of the Visegrad Four
Popis výsledku anglicky
This article explores the differences in risk assessment of the V4 states of two politically differently sensitive security threats (Russian influence and terrorism). The comparison was performed using two latest versions of national security strategies. Using discourse analysis and placing each national approach into the context of both national and international politics, it finds that significant differences exist in the understanding of security risks, even despite the same geopolitical localization and comparable situation of the individual V4 states. Regarding the threat of restoring Russian influence in the region, but also in the matter of fight with terrorism, each country accentuates different conclusions. An appeal to coordinate risk assessment would be appropriate not only on the government, but also on the expert and academic levels.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
The Journal of Slavic Military Studies
ISSN
1351-8046
e-ISSN
1556-3006
Svazek periodika
33
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
25
Strana od-do
173-197
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85087645473