The Czech Republic, Estonia and Finland: European vocation re-confirmed?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F15%3A%230001438" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/15:#0001438 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Czech Republic, Estonia and Finland: European vocation re-confirmed?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This chapter outlines first the key features of EU policies of the three countries, which constitute a framework for understanding their different views on the EEAS; the second section examines the foreign policy priorities of the Czech Republic, Estoniaand Finland, considering especially the EU's role in the formulation of national policies. That is followed by an overview of national diplomatic structures and their recent reforms in which the establishment of the EEAS played almost no role. The two last sections take a closer look at national positions on the EEAS and interaction between national diplomacies and the EU's nascent foreign service, highlighting similarities and differences among the three cases. To conclude, we argue that the differences between, on the one hand, the reserved positions of the Czech Republic towards the EEAS and, on the other hand, the more adaptive and constructive approaches of Estonia and Finland are in line with the broader EU policies of each count

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Czech Republic, Estonia and Finland: European vocation re-confirmed?

Popis výsledku anglicky

This chapter outlines first the key features of EU policies of the three countries, which constitute a framework for understanding their different views on the EEAS; the second section examines the foreign policy priorities of the Czech Republic, Estoniaand Finland, considering especially the EU's role in the formulation of national policies. That is followed by an overview of national diplomatic structures and their recent reforms in which the establishment of the EEAS played almost no role. The two last sections take a closer look at national positions on the EEAS and interaction between national diplomacies and the EU's nascent foreign service, highlighting similarities and differences among the three cases. To conclude, we argue that the differences between, on the one hand, the reserved positions of the Czech Republic towards the EEAS and, on the other hand, the more adaptive and constructive approaches of Estonia and Finland are in line with the broader EU policies of each count

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

AD - Politologie a politické vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GPP408%2F12%2FP905" target="_blank" >GPP408/12/P905: Česká politika v EU ve světle teorie rolí</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

The European External Action Service and National Foreign Ministries

ISBN

978-1-4724-4644-2

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

181-194

Počet stran knihy

238

Název nakladatele

Ashgate

Místo vydání

Farnham

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—