Strategies of contentious action: A comparative analysis of the women's movements in Poland and the Czech Republic
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F15%3A%230001469" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/15:#0001469 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14616696.2014.977321" target="_blank" >http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14616696.2014.977321</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2014.977321" target="_blank" >10.1080/14616696.2014.977321</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Strategies of contentious action: A comparative analysis of the women's movements in Poland and the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This article compares the contemporary Czech and Polish women's movements and demonstrates that there are significant differences in their strategies. While the Polish women's movement is more active in mobilizing the population and uses both transactional and participatory strategies in order to achieve its goals, the Czech women's movement focuses more on transactional activities, such as lobbying, setting up cooperation with national and international organizations, and negotiating with the authorities, as well as on educational activities. The article explains why these differences occur and why during the last decade the Polish women's movement has attempted at mobilizing the population successfully, while the Czech women's movement has not triedto organize any mass mobilizations. Based on interviews with women's organizations in Poland and the Czech Republic, we argue that institutional factors can explain these differences. This includes such factors as the role of the reformed
Název v anglickém jazyce
Strategies of contentious action: A comparative analysis of the women's movements in Poland and the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku anglicky
This article compares the contemporary Czech and Polish women's movements and demonstrates that there are significant differences in their strategies. While the Polish women's movement is more active in mobilizing the population and uses both transactional and participatory strategies in order to achieve its goals, the Czech women's movement focuses more on transactional activities, such as lobbying, setting up cooperation with national and international organizations, and negotiating with the authorities, as well as on educational activities. The article explains why these differences occur and why during the last decade the Polish women's movement has attempted at mobilizing the population successfully, while the Czech women's movement has not triedto organize any mass mobilizations. Based on interviews with women's organizations in Poland and the Czech Republic, we argue that institutional factors can explain these differences. This includes such factors as the role of the reformed
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AD - Politologie a politické vědy
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
European Societies
ISSN
1461-6696
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
17
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
19
Strana od-do
404-422
Kód UT WoS článku
000369767600002
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-84942373068