The end of democracy in the EU? The Eurozone crisis and the EU’s democratic deficit

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F19%3AN0000035" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/19:N0000035 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216224:14230/19:00109227

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07036337.2019.1569001" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07036337.2019.1569001</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1569001" target="_blank" >10.1080/07036337.2019.1569001</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The end of democracy in the EU? The Eurozone crisis and the EU’s democratic deficit

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article explores the impact of the Eurozone crisis on the EU´s ‘democratic deficit’. It starts with a presentation of the main scholarly views of the EU´s democratic deficit, distinguishing between four broad camps and showing how they differ in terms of their diagnoses as well as their solutions. Then the article moves to discussing the current relevance of the so-called ‘upgraded standard version’ of democratic deficit. Building on this approach and using its criteria, we assess the measures taken in the course of the crisis. The article focuses on the impact of the crisis on 1) the powers of the EU´s executive institutions, 2) the role played by the European Parliament, 3) the (non-)existence of the European political sphere and 4) the policy drift from voters´ preferences. Finally, the article summarizes our main findings and points to the opportunities and risks in the aftermath of the crisis.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The end of democracy in the EU? The Eurozone crisis and the EU’s democratic deficit

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article explores the impact of the Eurozone crisis on the EU´s ‘democratic deficit’. It starts with a presentation of the main scholarly views of the EU´s democratic deficit, distinguishing between four broad camps and showing how they differ in terms of their diagnoses as well as their solutions. Then the article moves to discussing the current relevance of the so-called ‘upgraded standard version’ of democratic deficit. Building on this approach and using its criteria, we assess the measures taken in the course of the crisis. The article focuses on the impact of the crisis on 1) the powers of the EU´s executive institutions, 2) the role played by the European Parliament, 3) the (non-)existence of the European political sphere and 4) the policy drift from voters´ preferences. Finally, the article summarizes our main findings and points to the opportunities and risks in the aftermath of the crisis.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION

ISSN

07036337

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

41

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

169-185

Kód UT WoS článku

000465181200003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—