Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Contestation over Truth Regimes: Russia, China and the US digital diplomacy on the Russian invasion of Ukraine

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F25%3AN0000016" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/25:N0000016 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://ams.overcastcdn.com/documents/RECLAIM_Contestation_over_Truth_Regimes.pdf" target="_blank" >https://ams.overcastcdn.com/documents/RECLAIM_Contestation_over_Truth_Regimes.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Contestation over Truth Regimes: Russia, China and the US digital diplomacy on the Russian invasion of Ukraine

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The report explores digital diplomacy campaigns conducted by three foreign powers (China, Russia, and in comparison, The United States) in selected EU member states. It sheds light on how the first two try to achieve a specific external impact – severing foreign populations’ links to the regimes of truth that constitute their states’ economies of power, including through strategic disinformation and propaganda efforts. In so doing, these campaigns aim to increase ontological and epistemological insecurity, creating a crisis of belonging, and knowledge production and transfer. They may reach this goal by spreading positive narratives about themselves (identity affirmation), by disseminating a particular worldview (truth construction); but also by challenging the existing regimes of truth (truth contestation). Subsequently, we compare their strategies with that of the United States. Empirically, the paper focuses on a particular ‘controversy’ – Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and its treatment in the tweets produced by diplomatic missions in the EU of the three foreign powers. Methodologically, the study combines quantitative and qualitative approaches, relying in particular on computer-enhanced critical discourse analysis. The report is result of Horizon RECLAIM - Reclaiming Liberal Democracy in Europe, no. 101061330.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Contestation over Truth Regimes: Russia, China and the US digital diplomacy on the Russian invasion of Ukraine

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The report explores digital diplomacy campaigns conducted by three foreign powers (China, Russia, and in comparison, The United States) in selected EU member states. It sheds light on how the first two try to achieve a specific external impact – severing foreign populations’ links to the regimes of truth that constitute their states’ economies of power, including through strategic disinformation and propaganda efforts. In so doing, these campaigns aim to increase ontological and epistemological insecurity, creating a crisis of belonging, and knowledge production and transfer. They may reach this goal by spreading positive narratives about themselves (identity affirmation), by disseminating a particular worldview (truth construction); but also by challenging the existing regimes of truth (truth contestation). Subsequently, we compare their strategies with that of the United States. Empirically, the paper focuses on a particular ‘controversy’ – Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and its treatment in the tweets produced by diplomatic missions in the EU of the three foreign powers. Methodologically, the study combines quantitative and qualitative approaches, relying in particular on computer-enhanced critical discourse analysis. The report is result of Horizon RECLAIM - Reclaiming Liberal Democracy in Europe, no. 101061330.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    V<sub>souhrn</sub> - Souhrnná výzkumná zpráva

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50601 - Political science

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Počet stran výsledku

    31

  • Místo vydání

    neuveden

  • Název nakladatele resp. objednatele

    European Commission

  • Verze