Citizenship for Sale? Some Thoughts on the Limits on Member States’ Competence to Grant Nationality According to the CJEU Case C-181/23 Commission v. Malta
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23320%2F25%3A43978272" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23320/25:43978272 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://publikacie.iuridica.truni.sk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/judikatura_st-obc_06-web.pdf" target="_blank" >https://publikacie.iuridica.truni.sk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/judikatura_st-obc_06-web.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Citizenship for Sale? Some Thoughts on the Limits on Member States’ Competence to Grant Nationality According to the CJEU Case C-181/23 Commission v. Malta
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
On 29 April 2025, the CJEU delivered a landmark judgment in Case C-181/23, concluding that Malta’s citizenship by investment scheme violates EU law. While Member States retain formal competence to determine the conditions for granting nationality, this judgment establishes that such competence is not unlimited when the acquisition of national citizenship automatically confers Union citizenship. Through critical analysis of the Court’s reasoning, the article argues that C-181/23 represents a significant evolution in EU citizenship jurisprudence, establishing that Union citizenship cannot be commodified and must be grounded in substantive constitutional values.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Citizenship for Sale? Some Thoughts on the Limits on Member States’ Competence to Grant Nationality According to the CJEU Case C-181/23 Commission v. Malta
Popis výsledku anglicky
On 29 April 2025, the CJEU delivered a landmark judgment in Case C-181/23, concluding that Malta’s citizenship by investment scheme violates EU law. While Member States retain formal competence to determine the conditions for granting nationality, this judgment establishes that such competence is not unlimited when the acquisition of national citizenship automatically confers Union citizenship. Through critical analysis of the Court’s reasoning, the article argues that C-181/23 represents a significant evolution in EU citizenship jurisprudence, establishing that Union citizenship cannot be commodified and must be grounded in substantive constitutional values.
Klasifikace
Druh
O - Ostatní výsledky
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů