PageRank variants in the evaluation of citation networks
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23520%2F14%3A43922491" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23520/14:43922491 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.06.005" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.06.005</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.06.005" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.joi.2014.06.005</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
PageRank variants in the evaluation of citation networks
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper explores a possible approach to a research evaluation, by calculating the renown of authors of scientific papers. The evaluation is based on the citation analysis and its results should be close to a human viewpoint. The PageRank algorithm andits modifications were used for the evaluation of various types of citation networks. Our main research question was whether better evaluation results were based directly on an author network or on a publication network. Other issues concerned, for example, the determination of weights in the author network and the distribution of publication scores among their authors. The citation networks were extracted from the computer science domain in the ISI Web of Science database. The influence of self-citations was also explored. To find the best network for a research evaluation, the outputs of PageRank were compared with lists of prestigious awards in computer science such as the Turing and Codd award, ISI Highly Cited and ACM Fellows. Our
Název v anglickém jazyce
PageRank variants in the evaluation of citation networks
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper explores a possible approach to a research evaluation, by calculating the renown of authors of scientific papers. The evaluation is based on the citation analysis and its results should be close to a human viewpoint. The PageRank algorithm andits modifications were used for the evaluation of various types of citation networks. Our main research question was whether better evaluation results were based directly on an author network or on a publication network. Other issues concerned, for example, the determination of weights in the author network and the distribution of publication scores among their authors. The citation networks were extracted from the computer science domain in the ISI Web of Science database. The influence of self-citations was also explored. To find the best network for a research evaluation, the outputs of PageRank were compared with lists of prestigious awards in computer science such as the Turing and Codd award, ISI Highly Cited and ACM Fellows. Our
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
IN - Informatika
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2014
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Informetrics
ISSN
1751-1577
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
8
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
683-692
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—