Treatment with fixed appliances and clear plastic appliances. Evaluation of results

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23520%2F19%3A43955261" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23520/19:43955261 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.orthodont-cz.cz/modul/casopis_clanek/soubory/Clanek-Ortodoncie-02-2019-02.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.orthodont-cz.cz/modul/casopis_clanek/soubory/Clanek-Ortodoncie-02-2019-02.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Treatment with fixed appliances and clear plastic appliances. Evaluation of results

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Aims: The retrospective study assessed outcomes of orthodontic treatment using fixed appliance and clear plastic aligner with PAR index, and compared effectiveness of the therapy with TEI (treatment efficiency index). Another aim was to compare the number of occlusal contacts and assess root parallelism in orthopantomogram. Material: The sample included 80 patients - 40 treated with fixed appliance, 40 with Invisalign. Method: PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) index was measured in all patients prior and after treatment in digital dental casts; the number of occlusal contacts was measured in occlusogram. Root parallelism was measured in OPG made prior and after the treatment. Conclusion: Results for both groups were acceptable. However, better quality results were achieved in the group treated with conventional fixed appliances. The length of treatment was shorter in the group treated with Invisalign. The number of occlusal contacts after the treatment was higher in patients treated with fixed appliance. Better root parallelism was found in patients with fixed appliance, the only exception being lower anterior segment where the results were similar in both groups.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Treatment with fixed appliances and clear plastic appliances. Evaluation of results

Popis výsledku anglicky

Aims: The retrospective study assessed outcomes of orthodontic treatment using fixed appliance and clear plastic aligner with PAR index, and compared effectiveness of the therapy with TEI (treatment efficiency index). Another aim was to compare the number of occlusal contacts and assess root parallelism in orthopantomogram. Material: The sample included 80 patients - 40 treated with fixed appliance, 40 with Invisalign. Method: PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) index was measured in all patients prior and after treatment in digital dental casts; the number of occlusal contacts was measured in occlusogram. Root parallelism was measured in OPG made prior and after the treatment. Conclusion: Results for both groups were acceptable. However, better quality results were achieved in the group treated with conventional fixed appliances. The length of treatment was shorter in the group treated with Invisalign. The number of occlusal contacts after the treatment was higher in patients treated with fixed appliance. Better root parallelism was found in patients with fixed appliance, the only exception being lower anterior segment where the results were similar in both groups.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30208 - Dentistry, oral surgery and medicine

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Ortodoncie

ISSN

1210-4272

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

28

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

89-101

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—