"What is Poetry?" Reconsidered

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12210%2F14%3A43889254" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12210/14:43889254 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

"What is Poetry?" Reconsidered

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper looks back to Jakobson's definition of poetry as formulated in his 'What is Poetry?' and 'Linguistics and Poetics'. It begins with a polemic essay written by Petr Fidelius that criticized Jakobson's functional approach to poetry for its reliance on a specific attitude of a reader. Is an artistic status of a text determined by its author's intention (as Fidelius believes), by properties of an artifact (as, according to Miroslav Červenka, suggests Jakobson's later reformulation of the poetic function), or by a recipient's attitude? These questions are discussed in view of several key studies asking 'What is Art?' (Shklovsky, Beardsley, Goodman, etc.). In conclusion, the author of the paper emphasizes the present significance of Jakobson's conception of poetry that, despite the fact that it does not provide us with a universal definition of what is art, continues to give us very stimulating answers to a question that might be even more important: 'What does art do?'

Název v anglickém jazyce

"What is Poetry?" Reconsidered

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper looks back to Jakobson's definition of poetry as formulated in his 'What is Poetry?' and 'Linguistics and Poetics'. It begins with a polemic essay written by Petr Fidelius that criticized Jakobson's functional approach to poetry for its reliance on a specific attitude of a reader. Is an artistic status of a text determined by its author's intention (as Fidelius believes), by properties of an artifact (as, according to Miroslav Červenka, suggests Jakobson's later reformulation of the poetic function), or by a recipient's attitude? These questions are discussed in view of several key studies asking 'What is Art?' (Shklovsky, Beardsley, Goodman, etc.). In conclusion, the author of the paper emphasizes the present significance of Jakobson's conception of poetry that, despite the fact that it does not provide us with a universal definition of what is art, continues to give us very stimulating answers to a question that might be even more important: 'What does art do?'

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

AJ - Písemnictví, mas–media, audiovize

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EE2.3.20.0125" target="_blank" >EE2.3.20.0125: Výzkum modelů reprezentací v literárních diskurzech</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Roman O. Jakobson: A Work in Progress

ISBN

978-80-244-4386-7

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

171-182

Počet stran knihy

206

Název nakladatele

Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci

Místo vydání

Olomouc

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—