Suárez on Pain and Touch

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12260%2F18%3A43898820" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12260/18:43898820 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14422/pen.v74.i279.y2018.004" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.14422/pen.v74.i279.y2018.004</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14422/pen.v74.i279.y2018.004" target="_blank" >10.14422/pen.v74.i279.y2018.004</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Suárez on Pain and Touch

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In the study the author aims at two main things. First, he points out an (at least) potential doctrinal incoherence in Suárez’s statements concerning the issue of the proper sensible object of touch. While in the context of his treatment of the sense of touch in DA VII, 13-14 Suárez restricts the total object of touch to external (tangent) qualities, in DA XI, 2, when treating the issue of emotions, the Jesuit includes also the qualitas dolorifera, i.e., a quality inherent in the percipient’s body. The author states that Suárez’s inconsistence is more urgent if his formulations are compared with those of Francisco de Oviedo. Second, the author indicates that Suárez’s “mixed view of pain”, combining both the perceptual and the affective aspects in the single experience of pain, is a kind of theory that can be regarded as an up-to-date position even in the contemporary debate among analytic philosophers.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Suárez on Pain and Touch

Popis výsledku anglicky

In the study the author aims at two main things. First, he points out an (at least) potential doctrinal incoherence in Suárez’s statements concerning the issue of the proper sensible object of touch. While in the context of his treatment of the sense of touch in DA VII, 13-14 Suárez restricts the total object of touch to external (tangent) qualities, in DA XI, 2, when treating the issue of emotions, the Jesuit includes also the qualitas dolorifera, i.e., a quality inherent in the percipient’s body. The author states that Suárez’s inconsistence is more urgent if his formulations are compared with those of Francisco de Oviedo. Second, the author indicates that Suárez’s “mixed view of pain”, combining both the perceptual and the affective aspects in the single experience of pain, is a kind of theory that can be regarded as an up-to-date position even in the contemporary debate among analytic philosophers.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GB14-37038G" target="_blank" >GB14-37038G: Mezi renesancí a barokem: Filosofie a vědění v českých zemích a jejich širší evropský kontext</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Pensamiento

ISSN

0031-4749

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

74

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

279

Stát vydavatele periodika

ES - Španělské království

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

75-90

Kód UT WoS článku

000439234400005

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85047008297