Sport as Part of a Good Life: Investigating the Debate

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12260%2F23%3A43907738" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12260/23:43907738 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.muni.cz/studiasportiva/article/view/33484/32210" target="_blank" >https://journals.muni.cz/studiasportiva/article/view/33484/32210</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/StS2023-2-7" target="_blank" >10.5817/StS2023-2-7</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Sport as Part of a Good Life: Investigating the Debate

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper is concerned with the question ‘What is the role of sport in a good life?’ My goal is to identify the main positions in a philosophical debate on the role of sport in a good life. Based on my readings I divide these positions into three general categories: (1) negative: sport does not belong to the realm of a good life); (2) differentiated: sport contributes to living a good life, but it is not the main domain; and (3) affirmative: sport significantly contributes to living a good life. I want to highlight those aspects of sport to which these positions refer and some arguments that these positions offer. The originality of this research lies in clarifying the main approaches (i.e. describing their general content and structure) and making their arguments explicit. This article is of theoretical nature and uses tools that are standardly used when dealing with these types of research questions, with the most important ones being description, demonstration of relevant thoughts, comparison, evaluation, and interpretation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Sport as Part of a Good Life: Investigating the Debate

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper is concerned with the question ‘What is the role of sport in a good life?’ My goal is to identify the main positions in a philosophical debate on the role of sport in a good life. Based on my readings I divide these positions into three general categories: (1) negative: sport does not belong to the realm of a good life); (2) differentiated: sport contributes to living a good life, but it is not the main domain; and (3) affirmative: sport significantly contributes to living a good life. I want to highlight those aspects of sport to which these positions refer and some arguments that these positions offer. The originality of this research lies in clarifying the main approaches (i.e. describing their general content and structure) and making their arguments explicit. This article is of theoretical nature and uses tools that are standardly used when dealing with these types of research questions, with the most important ones being description, demonstration of relevant thoughts, comparison, evaluation, and interpretation.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Studia Sportiva

ISSN

1802-7679

e-ISSN

2570-8783

Svazek periodika

17

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

83-94

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85191488449