The (Formal) Exclusiveness of Julius Zeyer’s Literary Language

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12410%2F19%3A43899984" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12410/19:43899984 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/60076658:12410/19:43900077

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/141973" target="_blank" >http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/141973</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/OS2019-3-1" target="_blank" >10.5817/OS2019-3-1</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The (Formal) Exclusiveness of Julius Zeyer’s Literary Language

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper is focused on identifying the principal signs of formal exclusiveness that denote Julius Zeyer’s literary language, precisely, his prose. Julius Zeyer wrote his prosaic works in standard Czech, deliberately differing from the contemporary usage, both common and neutral. The language used in his prosaic writings basically corresponded with the historicising concept of contemporary linguistics as recommended by language handbooks in the period. At all levels of usage, his prose presents numerous linguistic means which, even at that time, were considered mannered. Mannerism is thus understood as hypercorrect expression recommended for highly official communication, to which Zeyer’s idiolect, many times insecure, submitted in literary creations and which probably suited his idea of the aim and purpose of the artist’s work.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The (Formal) Exclusiveness of Julius Zeyer’s Literary Language

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper is focused on identifying the principal signs of formal exclusiveness that denote Julius Zeyer’s literary language, precisely, his prose. Julius Zeyer wrote his prosaic works in standard Czech, deliberately differing from the contemporary usage, both common and neutral. The language used in his prosaic writings basically corresponded with the historicising concept of contemporary linguistics as recommended by language handbooks in the period. At all levels of usage, his prose presents numerous linguistic means which, even at that time, were considered mannered. Mannerism is thus understood as hypercorrect expression recommended for highly official communication, to which Zeyer’s idiolect, many times insecure, submitted in literary creations and which probably suited his idea of the aim and purpose of the artist’s work.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60204 - General literature studies

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Opera Slavica

ISSN

1211-7676

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

XXIX

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

5-12

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—