On the Differences between DEA and Selected MCDM Methods

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12510%2F17%3A43897055" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12510/17:43897055 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

On the Differences between DEA and Selected MCDM Methods

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In many economic applications, it is necessary to compare some units, to choose the best one or to identify good ones. Many ways how to handle this problem exist. In this paper, we are interested in DEA and MCDM methods. Data envelopment analysis methods (DEA) are focused on productive efficiency of decision making units with respect to the values of their inputs and outputs. The aim of the DEA model is to identify a set of efficient and inefficient units. Multiple-criteria decision-making methods (MCDM) typically search for the ?best? alternative from a set of avaible alternatives or for a small group of ?optimal?alternatives. However, in these problems the solution depends on decision-maker?s preferences. It is known inputs of DEA are in fact costs criteria and outputs are profits criteria. Hence, it seems the aims of these methods are very similar. The aim of this paper is to discuss if it is possible to compare results of DEA and MCDM methods.

Název v anglickém jazyce

On the Differences between DEA and Selected MCDM Methods

Popis výsledku anglicky

In many economic applications, it is necessary to compare some units, to choose the best one or to identify good ones. Many ways how to handle this problem exist. In this paper, we are interested in DEA and MCDM methods. Data envelopment analysis methods (DEA) are focused on productive efficiency of decision making units with respect to the values of their inputs and outputs. The aim of the DEA model is to identify a set of efficient and inefficient units. Multiple-criteria decision-making methods (MCDM) typically search for the ?best? alternative from a set of avaible alternatives or for a small group of ?optimal?alternatives. However, in these problems the solution depends on decision-maker?s preferences. It is known inputs of DEA are in fact costs criteria and outputs are profits criteria. Hence, it seems the aims of these methods are very similar. The aim of this paper is to discuss if it is possible to compare results of DEA and MCDM methods.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10102 - Applied mathematics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Proceedings of the 11th International Scientific Conference INPROFORUM 2017. Innovations, Enterprises, Regions and Management

ISBN

978-80-7394-667-8

ISSN

2336-6788

e-ISSN

2336-6788

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

338-343

Název nakladatele

Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Ekonomická fakulta

Místo vydání

České Budějovice

Místo konání akce

České Budějovice

Datum konání akce

9. 11. 2017

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—