Cost and Benefit Criteria in MCDM Models

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41110%2F10%3A47382" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41110/10:47382 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Cost and Benefit Criteria in MCDM Models

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Both cost and benefit criteria are being used in multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) models. For more reasons (e.g. computational comfort or methods? algorithms programming) it could be more convenient to work with a unified type of the criteria; usually, the benefit type of the criteria is used for such a purpose. That is why some procedures for the transformation of cost criteria to benefit criteria are necessary to be used. Unfortunately, these procedures are usually outside of the MCDM methods?algo-rithms. The problem is that some combinations of criteria transformation method and the MCDM method provide incorrect results of the original MCDM model and so they cannot be used. In this paper we focus on several frequently used MCDM methods. Weanalyze and verify their correctness from the point of view of criteria type transformation procedures in order to decision-makers can avoid the distortion of the MCDM analysis results.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Cost and Benefit Criteria in MCDM Models

Popis výsledku anglicky

Both cost and benefit criteria are being used in multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) models. For more reasons (e.g. computational comfort or methods? algorithms programming) it could be more convenient to work with a unified type of the criteria; usually, the benefit type of the criteria is used for such a purpose. That is why some procedures for the transformation of cost criteria to benefit criteria are necessary to be used. Unfortunately, these procedures are usually outside of the MCDM methods?algo-rithms. The problem is that some combinations of criteria transformation method and the MCDM method provide incorrect results of the original MCDM model and so they cannot be used. In this paper we focus on several frequently used MCDM methods. Weanalyze and verify their correctness from the point of view of criteria type transformation procedures in order to decision-makers can avoid the distortion of the MCDM analysis results.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

BC - Teorie a systémy řízení

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2010

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

MME 2010 part I

ISBN

978-80-7394-218-2

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

—

Název nakladatele

University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice

Místo vydání

České Budějovice, Česká republika

Místo konání akce

České Budějovice, Česká republika

Datum konání akce

8. 9. 2010

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000287979900010