Meaning of Legitimacy in Local Political Process

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41110%2F13%3A61378" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41110/13:61378 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Meaning of Legitimacy in Local Political Process

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The principle aim of the article is to describe various concepts of legitimacy and their theoretical framework and to evaluate the possibility of their application in the local political process. The legitimacy of local political institutions can be perceived as one of the conditions of their stability and efficiency in relation to the rural development. The approaches and concepts of legitimacy of Max Weber, Luhmann, Tyler and Zimmerman and Zeitz are compared in the first part of article. To apply these classifications to local political institutions entails some theoretical and methodological problems, e.g. to distinguish legitimacy relating to communal politician from personal trust, ill-defined indicators of legitimacy, etc. Analysing various examples of legitimizing local magistrates and councils indicates that the communal legitimacy can be highly confused and can be based upon various sources of legitimation. One of the possible local legitimacy assesment is concept of the ? sys

Název v anglickém jazyce

Meaning of Legitimacy in Local Political Process

Popis výsledku anglicky

The principle aim of the article is to describe various concepts of legitimacy and their theoretical framework and to evaluate the possibility of their application in the local political process. The legitimacy of local political institutions can be perceived as one of the conditions of their stability and efficiency in relation to the rural development. The approaches and concepts of legitimacy of Max Weber, Luhmann, Tyler and Zimmerman and Zeitz are compared in the first part of article. To apply these classifications to local political institutions entails some theoretical and methodological problems, e.g. to distinguish legitimacy relating to communal politician from personal trust, ill-defined indicators of legitimacy, etc. Analysing various examples of legitimizing local magistrates and councils indicates that the communal legitimacy can be highly confused and can be based upon various sources of legitimation. One of the possible local legitimacy assesment is concept of the ? sys

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AD - Politologie a politické vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Auspicia

ISSN

1214-4967

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

ročník X

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

161-166

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—