Does a “CEO chairman ” guarantee better performance from a firm ?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41110%2F16%3A70964" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41110/16:70964 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/danb-2016-0009" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/danb-2016-0009</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/danb-2016-0009" target="_blank" >10.1515/danb-2016-0009</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Does a “CEO chairman ” guarantee better performance from a firm ?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper provides a brief review of the state of knowledge in the field of agency theory. The managerial power approach assumes that a chief executive officer is able to affect the scale of his or her pay. However, Kaplan (2012) and others see a different picture of the corporate-governance landscape, hence they provide certain market-based explanations for high compensation. Our paper examines the relationship between a firm’s performance and the amount of managerial compensation, and the ability of a CEO to affect a board’s decision regarding his or her total compensation. The dataset consists of 75 companies traded in the capital market in the US. Our panel dataset covers a 10-year period from 2004 to 2013. We developed a single equation panel data model. The resulting parameter values provide a different picture of CEO power and the interconnection between a firm’s performance and CEO pay in both sectors.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Does a “CEO chairman ” guarantee better performance from a firm ?
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper provides a brief review of the state of knowledge in the field of agency theory. The managerial power approach assumes that a chief executive officer is able to affect the scale of his or her pay. However, Kaplan (2012) and others see a different picture of the corporate-governance landscape, hence they provide certain market-based explanations for high compensation. Our paper examines the relationship between a firm’s performance and the amount of managerial compensation, and the ability of a CEO to affect a board’s decision regarding his or her total compensation. The dataset consists of 75 companies traded in the capital market in the US. Our panel dataset covers a 10-year period from 2004 to 2013. We developed a single equation panel data model. The resulting parameter values provide a different picture of CEO power and the interconnection between a firm’s performance and CEO pay in both sectors.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Danube: Law and Economics Review
ISSN
1804-8285
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
7
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
16
Strana od-do
145-160
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-84994444668