Equality in minority language maintenance – the phrasing of law

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41110%2F21%3A85283" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41110/21:85283 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Equality in minority language maintenance – the phrasing of law

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper focuses on the doctrinal legal analysis of the international law on minority language maintenance as it is reflected in Czech and Polish legislation. Syntactic and semantic ambiguities and vagueness in word meanings are examined with a focus on legal differences between autochthonous and immigrant communities and on the inflexibility of legal guarantees. It is concluded that there is no legal consensus as to who should benefit from legal provisions on language maintenance, because there is no universally accepted definition of national minority and there is no consensus on the justifiability of legal differentiation between traditional autochthonous minorities and newer communities of immigrants with respect to language rights. Additionally, current legal documents do not impose obligations on states to guarantee enforceable and equal linguistic rights for minorities.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Equality in minority language maintenance – the phrasing of law

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper focuses on the doctrinal legal analysis of the international law on minority language maintenance as it is reflected in Czech and Polish legislation. Syntactic and semantic ambiguities and vagueness in word meanings are examined with a focus on legal differences between autochthonous and immigrant communities and on the inflexibility of legal guarantees. It is concluded that there is no legal consensus as to who should benefit from legal provisions on language maintenance, because there is no universally accepted definition of national minority and there is no consensus on the justifiability of legal differentiation between traditional autochthonous minorities and newer communities of immigrants with respect to language rights. Additionally, current legal documents do not impose obligations on states to guarantee enforceable and equal linguistic rights for minorities.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Contexts and Plurality in Phraseology: Didactics, Learning and Translation

ISBN

9788374316705

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

135-152

Počet stran knihy

18

Název nakladatele

University of Białystok Publishing House

Místo vydání

Białystok

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—