The European Green Deal and the US Resolution to create a Green New Deal - A Comparative doctrinal analysis

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41110%2F22%3A91564" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41110/22:91564 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://ap.pef.czu.cz/en/r-12193-conference-proceedings" target="_blank" >https://ap.pef.czu.cz/en/r-12193-conference-proceedings</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The European Green Deal and the US Resolution to create a Green New Deal - A Comparative doctrinal analysis

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper presents a comparative doctrinal analysis of the European Green Deal, i.e. the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, and the US resolution to create a Green New Deal, i.e. the resolution of the Federal House of Representatives No 109, recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal. The purpose is to compare the discursive strategies employed in both legislative documents and to elucidate the respective linguistic forms as embodiments of comparative contextdependent discursive practices. The discursive strategies herein examined include nomination, predication, and argumentation. The results include the identification of similarities between the two central legal documents as well as differences in the used linguistic practices. The identified nominative and predicative discursive strategies include those which are seemingly neutral as well as

Název v anglickém jazyce

The European Green Deal and the US Resolution to create a Green New Deal - A Comparative doctrinal analysis

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper presents a comparative doctrinal analysis of the European Green Deal, i.e. the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, and the US resolution to create a Green New Deal, i.e. the resolution of the Federal House of Representatives No 109, recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal. The purpose is to compare the discursive strategies employed in both legislative documents and to elucidate the respective linguistic forms as embodiments of comparative contextdependent discursive practices. The discursive strategies herein examined include nomination, predication, and argumentation. The results include the identification of similarities between the two central legal documents as well as differences in the used linguistic practices. The identified nominative and predicative discursive strategies include those which are seemingly neutral as well as

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Agrarian Perspectives XXXI., Green Deal - Future Perspectives

ISBN

978-80-213-3211-9

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

2464-4781

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

241-250

Název nakladatele

CZech University of Life Sciences in Prague

Místo vydání

Prague

Místo konání akce

Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague

Datum konání akce

14. 9. 2022

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—