Towards Compromise User Experience Design in Ambient Intelligent Environment

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41110%2F22%3A92868" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41110/22:92868 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://online.agris.cz/archive/2022/02/01" target="_blank" >https://online.agris.cz/archive/2022/02/01</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7160/aol.2022.140201" target="_blank" >10.7160/aol.2022.140201</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Towards Compromise User Experience Design in Ambient Intelligent Environment

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Building, testing and evaluating UX for applications for Agricultural Ambient Intelligence Environments can be a difficult and time-consuming job. It can be an even longer and more challenging process due to their complexity and area of scope for complex intelligent systems. Many studies address the issue of UX design and evaluation of website user interface, mobiles, tangible equipment, wearable equipment and other, but it is necessary to look for UX deficiencies in all possible functions, every possible task. Depending on the structure of expert teams, experts opinions can vary broadly vary or may even contradict. This paper presents possibilities of use the Best-Compromise-Mean (BeCoMe) method for evaluation UX design. BeCoMe was not used for UX evaluation yet. Verification of whether the BeCoMe method is suitable for UX evaluation is carried out on a tablet using two prototypes of control panels of an intelligent environment.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Towards Compromise User Experience Design in Ambient Intelligent Environment

Popis výsledku anglicky

Building, testing and evaluating UX for applications for Agricultural Ambient Intelligence Environments can be a difficult and time-consuming job. It can be an even longer and more challenging process due to their complexity and area of scope for complex intelligent systems. Many studies address the issue of UX design and evaluation of website user interface, mobiles, tangible equipment, wearable equipment and other, but it is necessary to look for UX deficiencies in all possible functions, every possible task. Depending on the structure of expert teams, experts opinions can vary broadly vary or may even contradict. This paper presents possibilities of use the Best-Compromise-Mean (BeCoMe) method for evaluation UX design. BeCoMe was not used for UX evaluation yet. Verification of whether the BeCoMe method is suitable for UX evaluation is carried out on a tablet using two prototypes of control panels of an intelligent environment.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics

ISSN

1804-1930

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

14

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

3-13

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85133133751