DSS Capabilities Evaluation Using ANP with Methods for Consistency Improvement

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41110%2F22%3A93035" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41110/22:93035 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://mme2022.vspj.cz/proceedings" target="_blank" >https://mme2022.vspj.cz/proceedings</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

čeština

Název v původním jazyce

DSS Capabilities Evaluation Using ANP with Methods for Consistency Improvement

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper focuses on decision makers preferences for Decision Support Systems. A survey questionnaire and ANP method was used for Decision support systems (DSS) capabilities evaluation. Knowledge of DSS capabilities preferences is essential for organizations using, implementing or planning to implement DSS. ANP method is based on the pairwise comparison (Saaty method). Unfortunately, human judgement is often inconsistent and finding methods to improve inconsistency while keeping the unprecise comparisons representing the preferences of human decisions are essential. Traditionally, the Saaty method identifies inconsistency and suggests the deduction unless revision can be made with a decision maker which leads to changing his or her original opinion. Here, three methods for improving consistency were tested. The minimum deviation method, which highly preserves the original decision maker preferences while achieving the required consistency was selected for inconsistent pairwise comparisons modi

Název v anglickém jazyce

DSS Capabilities Evaluation Using ANP with Methods for Consistency Improvement

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper focuses on decision makers preferences for Decision Support Systems. A survey questionnaire and ANP method was used for Decision support systems (DSS) capabilities evaluation. Knowledge of DSS capabilities preferences is essential for organizations using, implementing or planning to implement DSS. ANP method is based on the pairwise comparison (Saaty method). Unfortunately, human judgement is often inconsistent and finding methods to improve inconsistency while keeping the unprecise comparisons representing the preferences of human decisions are essential. Traditionally, the Saaty method identifies inconsistency and suggests the deduction unless revision can be made with a decision maker which leads to changing his or her original opinion. Here, three methods for improving consistency were tested. The minimum deviation method, which highly preserves the original decision maker preferences while achieving the required consistency was selected for inconsistent pairwise comparisons modi

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50803 - Information science (social aspects)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

40th International Conference Mathematical Methods in Economics 2022 Proceedings

ISBN

978-80-88064-62-6

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

21-26

Název nakladatele

College of Polytechnics Jihlava

Místo vydání

Jihlava

Místo konání akce

Jihlava

Datum konání akce

7. 9. 2022

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—