Which McMaster egg counting technique is the most reliable?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41210%2F11%3A52508" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41210/11:52508 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2385-5" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2385-5</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2385-5" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00436-011-2385-5</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Which McMaster egg counting technique is the most reliable?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This study focuses on the comparison of three selected modifications of the McMaster counting technique, namely the McMaster method modified by Wetzel (W) and Zajíček (Z), as well as the concentration McMaster technique according to Roepstorff and Nansen(R&N). To investigate the sensitivity and reliability of these methods, nematode eggs (Teladorsagia circumcincta) were used. We prepared the exact number of eggs which were added to the parasite negative faeces; the faecal sample was then investigated.The highest sensitivity and reliability was obtained using the Roepstorff and Nansen modification. This McMaster modification is able to detect 20 eggs per sample (in 70% of samples). Concentrations of 200 and 500 eggs can be found in almost 100% of samples. Moreover, this method is simple, cheap and fast. For these reasons, we can recommend this method for routine veterinary practice.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Which McMaster egg counting technique is the most reliable?
Popis výsledku anglicky
This study focuses on the comparison of three selected modifications of the McMaster counting technique, namely the McMaster method modified by Wetzel (W) and Zajíček (Z), as well as the concentration McMaster technique according to Roepstorff and Nansen(R&N). To investigate the sensitivity and reliability of these methods, nematode eggs (Teladorsagia circumcincta) were used. We prepared the exact number of eggs which were added to the parasite negative faeces; the faecal sample was then investigated.The highest sensitivity and reliability was obtained using the Roepstorff and Nansen modification. This McMaster modification is able to detect 20 eggs per sample (in 70% of samples). Concentrations of 200 and 500 eggs can be found in almost 100% of samples. Moreover, this method is simple, cheap and fast. For these reasons, we can recommend this method for routine veterinary practice.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
GJ - Choroby a škůdci zvířat, veterinární medicina
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2011
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Parasitology Research
ISSN
0932-0113
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
109
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
5
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
1387-1394
Kód UT WoS článku
000296011300019
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—