The Concentration McMaster Technique is Suitable for Quantification of Coccidia Oocysts in Bird Droppings

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41210%2F13%3A60672" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41210/13:60672 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/60460709:41340/13:60672

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Concentration McMaster Technique is Suitable for Quantification of Coccidia Oocysts in Bird Droppings

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The objective of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the Concentration McMaster technique in counting coccidia oocysts and to compare it with two others - McMaster method modified by Wetzel and Zajíček. A stock suspension containing Eimeria oocysts was prepared, from which five concentrations (20, 250, 500, 1,000 and 1,500) of oocysts were made. Each method was evaluated after the examination of 30 samples in five concentrations. Each sample was presented as a parasite negative fecal droppinginto which a known number of oocysts were inoculated. When results of all three methods were compared, statistically significant differences (P<0.05) among them in each tested OPG concentration were found. The most diverse results (P<0.01) were providedby the Wetzel and Zajíček methods. The Wetzel method produced the least accurate results of all the evaluated methods and in all tested oocyst concentrations. This method was found inappropriate for counting coccidia oocysts in fecal drop

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Concentration McMaster Technique is Suitable for Quantification of Coccidia Oocysts in Bird Droppings

Popis výsledku anglicky

The objective of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the Concentration McMaster technique in counting coccidia oocysts and to compare it with two others - McMaster method modified by Wetzel and Zajíček. A stock suspension containing Eimeria oocysts was prepared, from which five concentrations (20, 250, 500, 1,000 and 1,500) of oocysts were made. Each method was evaluated after the examination of 30 samples in five concentrations. Each sample was presented as a parasite negative fecal droppinginto which a known number of oocysts were inoculated. When results of all three methods were compared, statistically significant differences (P<0.05) among them in each tested OPG concentration were found. The most diverse results (P<0.01) were providedby the Wetzel and Zajíček methods. The Wetzel method produced the least accurate results of all the evaluated methods and in all tested oocyst concentrations. This method was found inappropriate for counting coccidia oocysts in fecal drop

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

GJ - Choroby a škůdci zvířat, veterinární medicina

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

PAKISTAN VETERINARY JOURNAL

ISSN

0253-8318

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

33

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

291-295

Kód UT WoS článku

000321701200005

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—