Nutritional Value of Edible Insects as Alternative Food and Feed Protein Sources in the Czech Republic
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41210%2F25%3A102675" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41210/25:102675 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://conferences.imeko.org/event/12/attachments/907/1951/ImekoFoods25-Book%20of%20Abstracts.pdf" target="_blank" >https://conferences.imeko.org/event/12/attachments/907/1951/ImekoFoods25-Book%20of%20Abstracts.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Nutritional Value of Edible Insects as Alternative Food and Feed Protein Sources in the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The nutritional value of edible insects depends on many factors, including insect species, rearing conditions, and processing methods—including the way of killing. This study aimed to comprehensively monitor key nutritional parameters of six insect species collected from 13 rearing facilities in the Czech Republic. A total of six sampling rounds were conducted at approximately quarterly intervals to cover seasonal variation (2023: March, July, November; 2024: February, May, November). Altogether, 83 insect samples with a total fresh weight of 28.3 kg were obtained. The analysed species (Tenebrio molitor, Zophobas morio, Acheta domesticus, Alphitobius diaperinus, Gryllus assimilis, and Blaptica dubia) were killed either by freezing (-18 °C) or by blanching in boiling water for 5 minutes. In lyophilized samples, the following parameters were determined: dry matter and ash content (gravimetrically), total lipids (Soxhlet extraction), and crude protein content (Kjeldahl method with a nitrogen-to-protein conversion factor of 6.25). Nutritional values varied most significantly by insect species. Observed ranges were dry matter 16.3–41.0 g/100 g, ash 0.59–6.44 g/100 g of fresh weight (FW), fat 1.6–16.9 g/100 g FW, and crude protein 10.0–26.3 g/100 g FW. The way of killing had no significant effect on nutritional composition. However, significant differences in lipid, protein, and ash content were observed within individual insect species, depending on the season and rearing facility (rearing conditions including feed). Therefore, when using insects as food or feed, it is essential to assess their specific nutritional profile from each supplier. Additionally, the way of killing should also be recorded and considered.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Nutritional Value of Edible Insects as Alternative Food and Feed Protein Sources in the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku anglicky
The nutritional value of edible insects depends on many factors, including insect species, rearing conditions, and processing methods—including the way of killing. This study aimed to comprehensively monitor key nutritional parameters of six insect species collected from 13 rearing facilities in the Czech Republic. A total of six sampling rounds were conducted at approximately quarterly intervals to cover seasonal variation (2023: March, July, November; 2024: February, May, November). Altogether, 83 insect samples with a total fresh weight of 28.3 kg were obtained. The analysed species (Tenebrio molitor, Zophobas morio, Acheta domesticus, Alphitobius diaperinus, Gryllus assimilis, and Blaptica dubia) were killed either by freezing (-18 °C) or by blanching in boiling water for 5 minutes. In lyophilized samples, the following parameters were determined: dry matter and ash content (gravimetrically), total lipids (Soxhlet extraction), and crude protein content (Kjeldahl method with a nitrogen-to-protein conversion factor of 6.25). Nutritional values varied most significantly by insect species. Observed ranges were dry matter 16.3–41.0 g/100 g, ash 0.59–6.44 g/100 g of fresh weight (FW), fat 1.6–16.9 g/100 g FW, and crude protein 10.0–26.3 g/100 g FW. The way of killing had no significant effect on nutritional composition. However, significant differences in lipid, protein, and ash content were observed within individual insect species, depending on the season and rearing facility (rearing conditions including feed). Therefore, when using insects as food or feed, it is essential to assess their specific nutritional profile from each supplier. Additionally, the way of killing should also be recorded and considered.
Klasifikace
Druh
O - Ostatní výsledky
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
21101 - Food and beverages
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/QK23020101" target="_blank" >QK23020101: Komplexní laboratorní strategie pro identifikaci druhů hmyzu určeného k lidské spotřebě a produkci zpracované živočišné bílkoviny, autentikace potravin na jeho bázi</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů