Influence of different treshing system design on grain damage
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41310%2F16%3A71006" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41310/16:71006 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Influence of different treshing system design on grain damage
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The aim of this work was to identify and compare how the threshing mechanism of combine harvesters affects damage on the grain. This comparison was based on field measurements, which took place in 2014 and 2015. The measurements were performed on two types of combine harvesters, with tangential (MF Cerea 7270 and Claas Lexion 580) and axial (Case AFS 9210 and NH CR 9080) threshing mechanisms. Winter wheat and spring barley grains were evaluated after threshing. It was found, that the more damaged grains were after the work of combine harvesters threshing with the tangential way. In average, combine harvesters with tangential threshing mechanism damaged 1.84 % of grain in comparison with axial combine harvesters 0.35 % of grain. The results showed that the axial threshing system of grain harvesters damaged the grain significantly lower in comparison with the tangential threshing mechanism. Higher germination ratio was determined on grains which were harvested with axial harvester threshers. Difference
Název v anglickém jazyce
Influence of different treshing system design on grain damage
Popis výsledku anglicky
The aim of this work was to identify and compare how the threshing mechanism of combine harvesters affects damage on the grain. This comparison was based on field measurements, which took place in 2014 and 2015. The measurements were performed on two types of combine harvesters, with tangential (MF Cerea 7270 and Claas Lexion 580) and axial (Case AFS 9210 and NH CR 9080) threshing mechanisms. Winter wheat and spring barley grains were evaluated after threshing. It was found, that the more damaged grains were after the work of combine harvesters threshing with the tangential way. In average, combine harvesters with tangential threshing mechanism damaged 1.84 % of grain in comparison with axial combine harvesters 0.35 % of grain. The results showed that the axial threshing system of grain harvesters damaged the grain significantly lower in comparison with the tangential threshing mechanism. Higher germination ratio was determined on grains which were harvested with axial harvester threshers. Difference
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20102 - Construction engineering, Municipal and structural engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
15th International Scientific Conference on Engineering for Rural Development
ISBN
—
ISSN
1691-4031
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
756-761
Název nakladatele
Latvia University of Agriculture
Místo vydání
Jelgava
Místo konání akce
Jelgava
Datum konání akce
25. 5. 2016
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—