Perception and assessment of landscape aesthetic values in the Czech Republic - a literature review

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41330%2F10%3A47736" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41330/10:47736 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Perception and assessment of landscape aesthetic values in the Czech Republic - a literature review

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Perceiving and assessing landscape aesthetics has become an active area of interest in recent years. This paper begins with a brief survey of the historical development of landscape aesthetics perception in the Czech lands. Then two basic approaches in the field of landscape aesthetics are analysed. The objective approach considers aesthetic values to be an inherent quality of landscape, while a subjective approach regards the aesthetic qualities of a landscape as a product of the human mind. Two ways of assessing landscape aesthetics are used in the context of these approaches. Expert-based assessment is based on certain assumptions about aesthetic value, while perception-based assessment focuses on the individuality of the perceiving subject with his/her feelings, needs and imagination. This paper deals with the advantages and disadvantages of these two ways of making assessments.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Perception and assessment of landscape aesthetic values in the Czech Republic - a literature review

Popis výsledku anglicky

Perceiving and assessing landscape aesthetics has become an active area of interest in recent years. This paper begins with a brief survey of the historical development of landscape aesthetics perception in the Czech lands. Then two basic approaches in the field of landscape aesthetics are analysed. The objective approach considers aesthetic values to be an inherent quality of landscape, while a subjective approach regards the aesthetic qualities of a landscape as a product of the human mind. Two ways of assessing landscape aesthetics are used in the context of these approaches. Expert-based assessment is based on certain assumptions about aesthetic value, while perception-based assessment focuses on the individuality of the perceiving subject with his/her feelings, needs and imagination. This paper deals with the advantages and disadvantages of these two ways of making assessments.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AL - Umění, architektura, kulturní dědictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/QI91C200" target="_blank" >QI91C200: Hodnocení účinnosti realizace komplexních pozemkových úprav</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2010

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Landscape Studies - online version

ISSN

1802-4416

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

3

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—