Insects moving through forest-crop edges: a comparison among sampling methods

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41330%2F19%3A81515" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41330/19:81515 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10841-019-00201-6" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10841-019-00201-6</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10841-019-00201-6" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10841-019-00201-6</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Insects moving through forest-crop edges: a comparison among sampling methods

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Edges between natural and cultivated habitats have become dominant elements of all terrestrial ecosystems. Interchanges of several groups of organisms, such as insects, occur through these edges, potentially affecting ecosystem functioning and conservation of species and communities of neighboring habitats. Different trap types are used for collecting moving insects, although their effectiveness and complementarity for sampling in edges were not previously analyzed. Here, we evaluated the assemblages collected with three commonly used trap types (flight interception-FITs, yellow pan, and pitfall traps) at the boundaries between soybean fields and native forests in Central Argentina. We compared trap types from a taxonomic and functional perspective and determined their complementarity (how different assemblages were). In total, 66,949 arthropods from 1007 species were collected. Yellow pan traps collected more species and individuals, followed by FITs and pitfall traps. Pan traps and FITs showed low

Název v anglickém jazyce

Insects moving through forest-crop edges: a comparison among sampling methods

Popis výsledku anglicky

Edges between natural and cultivated habitats have become dominant elements of all terrestrial ecosystems. Interchanges of several groups of organisms, such as insects, occur through these edges, potentially affecting ecosystem functioning and conservation of species and communities of neighboring habitats. Different trap types are used for collecting moving insects, although their effectiveness and complementarity for sampling in edges were not previously analyzed. Here, we evaluated the assemblages collected with three commonly used trap types (flight interception-FITs, yellow pan, and pitfall traps) at the boundaries between soybean fields and native forests in Central Argentina. We compared trap types from a taxonomic and functional perspective and determined their complementarity (how different assemblages were). In total, 66,949 arthropods from 1007 species were collected. Yellow pan traps collected more species and individuals, followed by FITs and pitfall traps. Pan traps and FITs showed low

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10619 - Biodiversity conservation

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION

ISSN

1366-638X

e-ISSN

1572-9753

Svazek periodika

N

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

N

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

1-10

Kód UT WoS článku

000500542000001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85075943146