The map of biodiversity mapping

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41330%2F20%3A85116" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41330/20:85116 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320720309010?casa_token=WQKGFFtS1LMAAAAA:4_tiaCz0oSkZp_KxQyB4Z-Nm6xaGsCyn2GlOJTeBKKb71mm2XhPt_gAk7irkgeSR7H340SA9RjQ" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320720309010?casa_token=WQKGFFtS1LMAAAAA:4_tiaCz0oSkZp_KxQyB4Z-Nm6xaGsCyn2GlOJTeBKKb71mm2XhPt_gAk7irkgeSR7H340SA9RjQ</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108843" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108843</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The map of biodiversity mapping

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In the face of rapid biodiversity loss, attention has been increasingly focused on the application of maps towards the challenges of protecting biodiversity. However, biodiversity maps can lead, or have led us into, errors since they are too often not questioned by ecologists, who perceive them as an objective and legitimate representation of the natural world. The aim of this paper is to acknowledge and question our assumptions of (biodiversity) mapping for conservation through an epistemic approach. Discussing two dominant metaphors explaining those cognitive processes involved in mapping and the conventional nature of maps supported by the wide cartographic diversity adopted by human societies, I will stress the need to leave behind the belief of an objective approach for biodiversity mapping and conservation goals as opposed to an alternative mapping approach providing viable alternatives to mitigate or face rapid biodiversity loss in a more systemic way. This paper illustrates how biodiversity m

Název v anglickém jazyce

The map of biodiversity mapping

Popis výsledku anglicky

In the face of rapid biodiversity loss, attention has been increasingly focused on the application of maps towards the challenges of protecting biodiversity. However, biodiversity maps can lead, or have led us into, errors since they are too often not questioned by ecologists, who perceive them as an objective and legitimate representation of the natural world. The aim of this paper is to acknowledge and question our assumptions of (biodiversity) mapping for conservation through an epistemic approach. Discussing two dominant metaphors explaining those cognitive processes involved in mapping and the conventional nature of maps supported by the wide cartographic diversity adopted by human societies, I will stress the need to leave behind the belief of an objective approach for biodiversity mapping and conservation goals as opposed to an alternative mapping approach providing viable alternatives to mitigate or face rapid biodiversity loss in a more systemic way. This paper illustrates how biodiversity m

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10619 - Biodiversity conservation

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Biological Conservation

ISSN

0006-3207

e-ISSN

1873-2917

Svazek periodika

2020

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

252

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

1-8

Kód UT WoS článku

000599921700006

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85095694604