Carbon stocks vary in reference to the models used, socioecological factors and agroforestry practices in Central Ethiopia
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41340%2F24%3A100894" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41340/24:100894 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-024-00998-5" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-024-00998-5</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-024-00998-5" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10457-024-00998-5</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Carbon stocks vary in reference to the models used, socioecological factors and agroforestry practices in Central Ethiopia
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics have led to significant carbon (C) emissions. Agroforestry (AF) practices are suitable land-use options for tackling such declines in ecosystem services, including climate change (CC) mitigation and biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how biomass models, AF practices, and socioecological factors determine these roles, which hinder the implementation of climate change mitigation initiatives. This study aimed to i) evaluate the biomass carbon and soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks of the three AF practices in relation to socioecological variables in central Ethiopia, and ii) compare the biomass carbon stock using different allometric models. Three AF practices were considered, namely, homegardens, parklands, and woodlots. A total of 432 soil samples were collected from 0–30 and 30–60 cm soil depths. Out of this total, 216 samples were used to determine the soil organic carbon fraction (%C), while the remaining 216 samples were used to calculate the bulk density. The study found that the currently developed allometric equations were the most accurate to estimate biomass carbon stocks in the landscape when compared to previous models. The study found a higher overall biomass C stock in woodlots (165.6 Mg ha-1) than in homegardens (134.1 Mg ha-1) and parklands (20.0 Mg ha-1). Conversely, overall, SOC stock was higher for homegardens (143.9 Mg ha-1), but lower for parklands (53.4 Mg ha-1). The total C stock (biomass carbon and SOC stocks) was comparable between homegardens (277.9 Mg ha-1) and woodlots (275.4 Mg ha-1). The study found that elevation, wealth levels, AF farm age, and size have a positive and significant (P < 0.05) effect on overall biomass C stock but non-significant with slope (P > 0.05). Similarly, SOC stock increased with increasing elevation, AF farm age, and wealth status but decreased with slope and non-significant with AF farm size. The study also showed that species diversity had a positive (P < 0.05) effect on overall biomass C stock in homegardens. The overall study highlights that AF practices have great potential to lock up more carbon in biomass and soils; however, these potentials were determined by socioecological variables. Thus, these factors should be considered in management strategies that preserve trees in agricultural landscapes in order to mitigate climate change and support the livelihoods of farmers.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Carbon stocks vary in reference to the models used, socioecological factors and agroforestry practices in Central Ethiopia
Popis výsledku anglicky
Deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics have led to significant carbon (C) emissions. Agroforestry (AF) practices are suitable land-use options for tackling such declines in ecosystem services, including climate change (CC) mitigation and biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how biomass models, AF practices, and socioecological factors determine these roles, which hinder the implementation of climate change mitigation initiatives. This study aimed to i) evaluate the biomass carbon and soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks of the three AF practices in relation to socioecological variables in central Ethiopia, and ii) compare the biomass carbon stock using different allometric models. Three AF practices were considered, namely, homegardens, parklands, and woodlots. A total of 432 soil samples were collected from 0–30 and 30–60 cm soil depths. Out of this total, 216 samples were used to determine the soil organic carbon fraction (%C), while the remaining 216 samples were used to calculate the bulk density. The study found that the currently developed allometric equations were the most accurate to estimate biomass carbon stocks in the landscape when compared to previous models. The study found a higher overall biomass C stock in woodlots (165.6 Mg ha-1) than in homegardens (134.1 Mg ha-1) and parklands (20.0 Mg ha-1). Conversely, overall, SOC stock was higher for homegardens (143.9 Mg ha-1), but lower for parklands (53.4 Mg ha-1). The total C stock (biomass carbon and SOC stocks) was comparable between homegardens (277.9 Mg ha-1) and woodlots (275.4 Mg ha-1). The study found that elevation, wealth levels, AF farm age, and size have a positive and significant (P < 0.05) effect on overall biomass C stock but non-significant with slope (P > 0.05). Similarly, SOC stock increased with increasing elevation, AF farm age, and wealth status but decreased with slope and non-significant with AF farm size. The study also showed that species diversity had a positive (P < 0.05) effect on overall biomass C stock in homegardens. The overall study highlights that AF practices have great potential to lock up more carbon in biomass and soils; however, these potentials were determined by socioecological variables. Thus, these factors should be considered in management strategies that preserve trees in agricultural landscapes in order to mitigate climate change and support the livelihoods of farmers.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
40100 - Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Agroforestry Systems
ISSN
0167-4366
e-ISSN
0167-4366
Svazek periodika
98
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
21
Strana od-do
1905-1925
Kód UT WoS článku
001220881100001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85192860591