Gender Equality Barriers in Agriculture and Life Sciences in Central European Universities
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41340%2F25%3A106179" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41340/25:106179 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.17645/si.10086" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.17645/si.10086</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/si.10086" target="_blank" >10.17645/si.10086</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Gender Equality Barriers in Agriculture and Life Sciences in Central European Universities
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The European Union aims to foster research excellence, among others, by increasing gender equality (GE) in the European research area. The mandatory introduction of gender equality plans (GEP) mobilised universities to assess, target, and monitor GE in different fields of science. A wide range of barriers have been explored in STEM fields (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics), characterised by the low participation of women. However, significant obstacles to GE can emerge in relatively more gender-balanced and, therefore, rarely studied fields, such as agriculture and life sciences (ALS). Experiences can differ in Central and Eastern European countries, characterised by rather traditional gender and family norms. This study explores different stakeholders' perceptions of the main barriers of GE, with particular attention to ALS. We conducted nine focus groups (82 participants in total) with middle management, academic staff, and students from Czech, Hungarian, and Slovenian universities, aiming to contribute to the revision of their first GEP. Discussions were centred on recruitment, leadership positions, work-life balance, gender-based violence, sexual harassment, organisational culture, integrating the gender dimension into research and teaching, and institutionalisation of GEPs. Findings revealed that women in ALS face partly similar gender-based obstacles to their counterparts in less gender-balanced fields-perceptions of education and career choices, work-life imbalance, and exclusion by recruitment and promotion practices-and also additional ALS-related challenges of laboratory and fieldwork. Findings highlight the need for institutions to carefully address these areas in their state-of-the-art assessments and develop sector-specific, tailor-made GEPs.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Gender Equality Barriers in Agriculture and Life Sciences in Central European Universities
Popis výsledku anglicky
The European Union aims to foster research excellence, among others, by increasing gender equality (GE) in the European research area. The mandatory introduction of gender equality plans (GEP) mobilised universities to assess, target, and monitor GE in different fields of science. A wide range of barriers have been explored in STEM fields (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics), characterised by the low participation of women. However, significant obstacles to GE can emerge in relatively more gender-balanced and, therefore, rarely studied fields, such as agriculture and life sciences (ALS). Experiences can differ in Central and Eastern European countries, characterised by rather traditional gender and family norms. This study explores different stakeholders' perceptions of the main barriers of GE, with particular attention to ALS. We conducted nine focus groups (82 participants in total) with middle management, academic staff, and students from Czech, Hungarian, and Slovenian universities, aiming to contribute to the revision of their first GEP. Discussions were centred on recruitment, leadership positions, work-life balance, gender-based violence, sexual harassment, organisational culture, integrating the gender dimension into research and teaching, and institutionalisation of GEPs. Findings revealed that women in ALS face partly similar gender-based obstacles to their counterparts in less gender-balanced fields-perceptions of education and career choices, work-life imbalance, and exclusion by recruitment and promotion practices-and also additional ALS-related challenges of laboratory and fieldwork. Findings highlight the need for institutions to carefully address these areas in their state-of-the-art assessments and develop sector-specific, tailor-made GEPs.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50403 - Social topics (Women´s and gender studies; Social issues; Family studies; Social work)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Social Inclusion
ISSN
2183-2803
e-ISSN
2183-2803
Svazek periodika
13
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2025
Stát vydavatele periodika
PT - Portugalská republika
Počet stran výsledku
20
Strana od-do
—
Kód UT WoS článku
001591059200016
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105019504135