Effect of buffer in simulated body fluid on morphology and crystallinity of hydroxyapatite precipitated on 45S5 bioactive glass-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds: comparison of Good´s buffer system and tris
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60461373%3A22310%2F21%3A43922237" target="_blank" >RIV/60461373:22310/21:43922237 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468519421001075" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468519421001075</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100527" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100527</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Effect of buffer in simulated body fluid on morphology and crystallinity of hydroxyapatite precipitated on 45S5 bioactive glass-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds: comparison of Good´s buffer system and tris
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In vitro tests that verify the ability of a material to form bone-like apatite (HAp) use a solution that imitates the inorganic part of blood plasma, simulated body fluid (SBF). During such tests, it is necessary to maintain a neutral pH, for which purpose the International Standards Organization recommends the TRIS buffer (ISO - 23317:2014). To do this, TRIS buffer must remain inert, but, as we have previously reported, TRIS interacts with highly bioreactive materials (such as 45S5 Bioglass derived scaffolds), thereby accelerating scaffold dissolution. In the search for an alternative to TRIS, we have also recently published results for the HEPES and MOPS buffers, which were also unable to maintain a neutral pH in SBF. Thus, we here continue our search for a more suitable Good´s buffer by comparing BES (N,N-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid) and TES (2-[(2-Hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl) ethyl) amino] ethanesulfonic acid) with TRIS. 45S5-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds were tested under static-dynamic conditions for bone-like apatite formation using SBF+BES and SBF+TES solutions. The pH measurements, leachate analysis [AAS (Ca2+, SiIV), UV-VIS spectrophotometry (PO4)3-] and scaffold analysis (XRD, XRF, SEM/EDS, BET) all showed that both BES and TES quickly interacted with the tested material. Moreover, the kinetics of the glass-ceramic dissolution affected the crystallinity and morphology of the precipitated HAp. Based on our previous results and the present data, it appears that Good´s buffers are not suitable for the in vitro testing of bioactivity of highly bioreactive materials.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Effect of buffer in simulated body fluid on morphology and crystallinity of hydroxyapatite precipitated on 45S5 bioactive glass-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds: comparison of Good´s buffer system and tris
Popis výsledku anglicky
In vitro tests that verify the ability of a material to form bone-like apatite (HAp) use a solution that imitates the inorganic part of blood plasma, simulated body fluid (SBF). During such tests, it is necessary to maintain a neutral pH, for which purpose the International Standards Organization recommends the TRIS buffer (ISO - 23317:2014). To do this, TRIS buffer must remain inert, but, as we have previously reported, TRIS interacts with highly bioreactive materials (such as 45S5 Bioglass derived scaffolds), thereby accelerating scaffold dissolution. In the search for an alternative to TRIS, we have also recently published results for the HEPES and MOPS buffers, which were also unable to maintain a neutral pH in SBF. Thus, we here continue our search for a more suitable Good´s buffer by comparing BES (N,N-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid) and TES (2-[(2-Hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl) ethyl) amino] ethanesulfonic acid) with TRIS. 45S5-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds were tested under static-dynamic conditions for bone-like apatite formation using SBF+BES and SBF+TES solutions. The pH measurements, leachate analysis [AAS (Ca2+, SiIV), UV-VIS spectrophotometry (PO4)3-] and scaffold analysis (XRD, XRF, SEM/EDS, BET) all showed that both BES and TES quickly interacted with the tested material. Moreover, the kinetics of the glass-ceramic dissolution affected the crystallinity and morphology of the precipitated HAp. Based on our previous results and the present data, it appears that Good´s buffers are not suitable for the in vitro testing of bioactivity of highly bioreactive materials.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20504 - Ceramics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Materials Today Chemistry
ISSN
2468-5194
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
21
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
Neuveden
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
1-9
Kód UT WoS článku
000696937300014
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85111318825