Clinical and radiological results of TLIF surgery with titanium‑coated PEEK or uncoated PEEK cages: a prospective single‑centre randomised study

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61383082%3A_____%2F23%3A00001304" target="_blank" >RIV/61383082:_____/23:00001304 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37737497/" target="_blank" >https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37737497/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07947-3" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00586-023-07947-3</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Clinical and radiological results of TLIF surgery with titanium‑coated PEEK or uncoated PEEK cages: a prospective single‑centre randomised study

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background: A comparison of fusion rates and clinical outcomes of instrumented transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) between polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium-coated PEEK (Ti-PEEK) cages is not well documented. Methods: A single-centre, prospective, randomised study included patients who underwent one-level TLIF between L3-S1 segments. Patients were randomised into one of two groups: TLIF surgery with the PEEK cage and TLIF surgery with the Ti-PEEK cage. Clinical results were measured. All patients were assessed by repeated X-rays and 3D CT scans. Cage integration was assessed using a modified Bridwell classification. The impact of obesity and smoking on fusion quality was also analysed. Patients in both groups were followed up for 2 years. Results: Altogether 87 patients were included in the study: of these 87 patients, 81 (93.1%) completed the 2-year follow-up. A significant improvement in clinical outcome was found in the two measurements scales in both groups (RM: p = 0.257, VAS: p = 0.229). There was an increase in CobbS and CobbL angle in both groups (p = 0.172 for CobbS and p = 0.403for CobbL). Bony fusion was achieved in 37 of 40 (92.5%) patients in the TiPEEK group and 35 of 41 (85.4%) in the PEEK group (p = 0.157). Cage subsided in 2 of 40 patients (5%) in the TiPEEK group and 11 of 41 (26.8%) in the PEEK group (p = 0.007). Body mass index > 30 and smoking were not predictive factors of bony fusion achievement. Conclusion: There is no significant advantage of TiPEEK cages over PEEK cages in clinical outcome and fusion rate 2 years after surgery.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Clinical and radiological results of TLIF surgery with titanium‑coated PEEK or uncoated PEEK cages: a prospective single‑centre randomised study

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background: A comparison of fusion rates and clinical outcomes of instrumented transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) between polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium-coated PEEK (Ti-PEEK) cages is not well documented. Methods: A single-centre, prospective, randomised study included patients who underwent one-level TLIF between L3-S1 segments. Patients were randomised into one of two groups: TLIF surgery with the PEEK cage and TLIF surgery with the Ti-PEEK cage. Clinical results were measured. All patients were assessed by repeated X-rays and 3D CT scans. Cage integration was assessed using a modified Bridwell classification. The impact of obesity and smoking on fusion quality was also analysed. Patients in both groups were followed up for 2 years. Results: Altogether 87 patients were included in the study: of these 87 patients, 81 (93.1%) completed the 2-year follow-up. A significant improvement in clinical outcome was found in the two measurements scales in both groups (RM: p = 0.257, VAS: p = 0.229). There was an increase in CobbS and CobbL angle in both groups (p = 0.172 for CobbS and p = 0.403for CobbL). Bony fusion was achieved in 37 of 40 (92.5%) patients in the TiPEEK group and 35 of 41 (85.4%) in the PEEK group (p = 0.157). Cage subsided in 2 of 40 patients (5%) in the TiPEEK group and 11 of 41 (26.8%) in the PEEK group (p = 0.007). Body mass index > 30 and smoking were not predictive factors of bony fusion achievement. Conclusion: There is no significant advantage of TiPEEK cages over PEEK cages in clinical outcome and fusion rate 2 years after surgery.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30103 - Neurosciences (including psychophysiology)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Spine Journal

ISSN

0940-6719

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2023

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

Sept

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

1-7

Kód UT WoS článku

001071707900003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—