Round robin comparison study on the form measurement of optical freeform surfaces

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61389021%3A_____%2F20%3A00541106" target="_blank" >RIV/61389021:_____/20:00541106 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://jeos.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s41476-019-0124-1.pdf" target="_blank" >https://jeos.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s41476-019-0124-1.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41476-019-0124-1" target="_blank" >10.1186/s41476-019-0124-1</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Round robin comparison study on the form measurement of optical freeform surfaces

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

A round robin comparison of freeform form measurements was carried out by the project partners and stakeholders of a European metrology research project. Altogether six measuring instruments were considered: five different (pointwise and areal) optical devices and one tactile device. Three optical freeform surfaces were used for the comparison measurements, where two specimens were measured by five instruments and one specimen by four instruments. In this paper, the evaluation methods and results of this round robin are presented for the three freeform surfaces made from a temperature-stable material, Super Invar ®. The freeforms had diameters of 40 mm, 50 mm and 100 mm and best-fit radii of 39.75 mm (convex), 40.9 mm (convex) and 423.5 mm (concave). For comparison, the bilateral pointwise differences between the available measurements were calculated. The root-mean-square values of these differences ranged from 15 nm to 110 nm (neglecting spherical contributions) and provided an insight into the status of typical freeform measurement capabilities for optical surfaces.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Round robin comparison study on the form measurement of optical freeform surfaces

Popis výsledku anglicky

A round robin comparison of freeform form measurements was carried out by the project partners and stakeholders of a European metrology research project. Altogether six measuring instruments were considered: five different (pointwise and areal) optical devices and one tactile device. Three optical freeform surfaces were used for the comparison measurements, where two specimens were measured by five instruments and one specimen by four instruments. In this paper, the evaluation methods and results of this round robin are presented for the three freeform surfaces made from a temperature-stable material, Super Invar ®. The freeforms had diameters of 40 mm, 50 mm and 100 mm and best-fit radii of 39.75 mm (convex), 40.9 mm (convex) and 423.5 mm (concave). For comparison, the bilateral pointwise differences between the available measurements were calculated. The root-mean-square values of these differences ranged from 15 nm to 110 nm (neglecting spherical contributions) and provided an insight into the status of typical freeform measurement capabilities for optical surfaces.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10306 - Optics (including laser optics and quantum optics)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of the European Optical Society: Rapid publications

ISSN

1990-2573

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

16

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

2

Kód UT WoS článku

000511497800001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85077508507