Rozdíly mezi předepisovanými denními dávkami a definovanými denními dávkami antiepileptik - terapeutické monitorování jako marker kvality terapie
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F06%3AA0900JCG" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/06:A0900JCG - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Differences between prescribed daily doses and defined daily doses of antiepileptics-therapeutic drug monitoring as a marker of the quality of the treatment.
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Objective: Prescribed daily doses (PDDs) of antiepileptics (N03A ATC group) were recorded for drugs used in monotherapy or in combination therapy in the University Hospital in Ostrava, Czechia. Plasma levels were used as an indicator of the quality of treatment. Method: Request and reply forms for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) were used as a source of PDDs and plasma levels. Conclusions: PDDs in monotherapy were similar or slightly lower than in combination therapy with an exception for lamotrigine,NS. The differences were significant in carbamazepine, p < 0.0001, and valproic acid, p < 0.001. Patients with plasma levels within the therapeutic range were usually treated with similar or slightly higher doses than the remainder. In general plasma levels tended to be below the therapeutic range. The differences between PDD and DDD of antiepileptics have to be taken into account especially when utilization of different drugs is compared.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Differences between prescribed daily doses and defined daily doses of antiepileptics-therapeutic drug monitoring as a marker of the quality of the treatment.
Popis výsledku anglicky
Objective: Prescribed daily doses (PDDs) of antiepileptics (N03A ATC group) were recorded for drugs used in monotherapy or in combination therapy in the University Hospital in Ostrava, Czechia. Plasma levels were used as an indicator of the quality of treatment. Method: Request and reply forms for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) were used as a source of PDDs and plasma levels. Conclusions: PDDs in monotherapy were similar or slightly lower than in combination therapy with an exception for lamotrigine,NS. The differences were significant in carbamazepine, p < 0.0001, and valproic acid, p < 0.001. Patients with plasma levels within the therapeutic range were usually treated with similar or slightly higher doses than the remainder. In general plasma levels tended to be below the therapeutic range. The differences between PDD and DDD of antiepileptics have to be taken into account especially when utilization of different drugs is compared.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FR - Farmakologie a lékárnická chemie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2006
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
INT J CLIN PHARM TH
ISSN
0946-1965
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
44
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
9
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
4
Strana od-do
—
Kód UT WoS článku
000240244500006
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—