Comparison of three screening tools for nutritional status assessment of the elderly in their homes
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F12%3AA13015ZD" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/12:A13015ZD - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Comparison of three screening tools for nutritional status assessment of the elderly in their homes
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The aim of the study was to compare three nutritional status screening and evaluation tools of the elderly in their homes. Testing of measuring instruments, MNA, SGA, and MUST took place in the homes of 120 seniors in selected areas of the Czech and Slovak Rep. The study included 120 seniors. For testing of the relationships and dependencies, Pearson?s correlation coefficient, t and Fisher tests were used. All tests were to a large degree correlated (pMNA = 0,0049; pMUST = -0,537; pSGA = -0,578) with the body mass index of the seniors. It was confirmed that the tools for assessing nutritional status in the study showed significant differences regarding the classification of patients at risk of malnutrition and/or malnourished patients. We conclude thatMNA appeared to be a more appropriate tool for nutritional assessment of the elderly living in their homes. SGA and MUST provided rather subjective evaluation of the nutritional status and did not furnish an in-depth categorization of ma
Název v anglickém jazyce
Comparison of three screening tools for nutritional status assessment of the elderly in their homes
Popis výsledku anglicky
The aim of the study was to compare three nutritional status screening and evaluation tools of the elderly in their homes. Testing of measuring instruments, MNA, SGA, and MUST took place in the homes of 120 seniors in selected areas of the Czech and Slovak Rep. The study included 120 seniors. For testing of the relationships and dependencies, Pearson?s correlation coefficient, t and Fisher tests were used. All tests were to a large degree correlated (pMNA = 0,0049; pMUST = -0,537; pSGA = -0,578) with the body mass index of the seniors. It was confirmed that the tools for assessing nutritional status in the study showed significant differences regarding the classification of patients at risk of malnutrition and/or malnourished patients. We conclude thatMNA appeared to be a more appropriate tool for nutritional assessment of the elderly living in their homes. SGA and MUST provided rather subjective evaluation of the nutritional status and did not furnish an in-depth categorization of ma
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FQ - Veřejné zdravotnictví, sociální lékařství
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2012
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Biomedical papers
ISSN
1213-8118
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
156
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
371-376
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—